
In this challenge, you are provided with an integer array nums and two integer values, indexDiff and valueDiff. Your task is to determine if there exists a pair of indices (i, j) in the array where the following conditions are all satisfied:
i and j are distinct (i.e., i is not equal to j).i and j does not exceed indexDiff (abs(i - j) <= indexDiff).valueDiff (abs(nums[i] - nums[j]) <= valueDiff).The function should return true if such a pair exists, otherwise false.
Input:
nums = [1,2,3,1], indexDiff = 3, valueDiff = 0
Output:
true
Explanation:
We can choose (i, j) = (0, 3). We satisfy the three conditions: i != j --> 0 != 3 abs(i - j) <= indexDiff --> abs(0 - 3) <= 3 abs(nums[i] - nums[j]) <= valueDiff --> abs(1 - 1) <= 0
Input:
nums = [1,5,9,1,5,9], indexDiff = 2, valueDiff = 3
Output:
false
Explanation:
After trying all the possible pairs (i, j), we cannot satisfy the three conditions, so we return false.
2 <= nums.length <= 105-109 <= nums[i] <= 1091 <= indexDiff <= nums.length0 <= valueDiff <= 109The problem requires checking pairs in an array to fulfill both index and value difference constraints. Here's how to think about it:
Sliding Window Approach: Given the limitation by indexDiff on how far apart indices can be, this problem naturally leans towards a sliding window or two-pointer approach.
nums[i].i+1 to min(i + indexDiff, len(nums) - 1).abs(nums[i] - nums[j]) <= valueDiff, return true.Use of Appropriate Data Structure: To efficiently check the condition abs(nums[i] - nums[j]) <= valueDiff, a balanced tree or a sorted data structure might help, but given typical constraint sizes, a simpler approach might work adequately, using direct computation.
Boundary Checks:
valueDiff is 0, we are looking for exact duplicates within the allowed index range.With respect to the provided examples:
Example 1: "nums = [1,2,3,1], indexDiff = 3, valueDiff = 0". Directly iterate through nums and for each i, check other indices within the valid range. Here, nums[0] and nums[3] both are 1 and within index distance 3, hence, true.
Example 2: Despite similar checks as in Example 1, no pairs (i, j) satisfy all given conditions due to larger differences in values compared to the allowed valueDiff, thus, false.
class Solution {
public:
long calculateBucketID(long element, long width) {
return element < 0 ? (element + 1) / width - 1 : element / width;
}
bool hasNearbyDuplicate(vector<int>& elements, int range, int tolerance) {
if (tolerance < 0) return false;
unordered_map<long, long> mapBuckets;
long width = (long)tolerance + 1;
for (int i = 0; i < elements.size(); ++i) {
long bucketID = calculateBucketID(elements[i], width);
if (mapBuckets.count(bucketID)) return true;
if (mapBuckets.count(bucketID - 1) &&
abs(elements[i] - mapBuckets[bucketID - 1]) < width)
return true;
if (mapBuckets.count(bucketID + 1) &&
abs(elements[i] - mapBuckets[bucketID + 1]) < width)
return true;
mapBuckets[bucketID] = (long)elements[i];
if (i >= range) {
mapBuckets.erase(calculateBucketID(elements[i - range], width));
}
}
return false;
}
};
The provided C++ solution addresses the problem of determining whether an array contains duplicates within a certain index range and value difference. Edit the hasNearbyDuplicate function to explore an array of integers, using a system of logical bucketing whereby each element is assigned to a computed bucket ID based on its value and the allowed tolerance.
calculateBucketID computes and returns the bucket ID for a given element based on its value and the specified width (tolerance + 1). It accounts for negative elements correctly by adjusting the bucket computation, ensuring accurate mapping.mapBuckets to store elements mapped to their respective bucket IDs.width as the tolerance increased by one, used for bucketing.mapBuckets and meet the criteria of having an absolute difference less than width. If found, return true, indicating a duplicate under the specified conditions.mapBuckets with the element.range), remove the oldest element's bucket from mapBuckets to maintain the constraint of considering only the nearby elements.class Solution {
// Determine the bucket ID
private long bucketId(long x, long width) {
return Math.floorDiv(x, width);
}
public boolean checkDuplicatesWithinK(int[] nums, int k, int t) {
if (t < 0) return false;
Map<Long, Long> map = new HashMap<>();
long bucketWidth = (long) t + 1;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; ++i) {
long currentBucketId = bucketId(nums[i], bucketWidth);
if (map.containsKey(currentBucketId)) return true;
if (map.containsKey(currentBucketId - 1) && Math.abs(nums[i] - map.get(currentBucketId - 1)) < bucketWidth)
return true;
if (map.containsKey(currentBucketId + 1) && Math.abs(nums[i] - map.get(currentBucketId + 1)) < bucketWidth)
return true;
map.put(currentBucketId, (long) nums[i]);
if (i >= k) map.remove(bucketId(nums[i - k], bucketWidth));
}
return false;
}
}
In the Java solution to the "Contains Duplicate III" problem, the task is to determine if there are any duplicates in the array such that:
t.k.Here's how the solution works:
bucketId(long x, long width) to calculate the bucket ID for an element considering the bucket width, which is set to t + 1. The bucket ID is computed using Math.floorDiv(x, width).checkDuplicatesWithinK, it initially checks if t < 0, immediately returning false if true, as a negative t doesn't make sense in the context of absolute differences.HashMap to track the elements and their corresponding bucket IDs.nums. For each element:k) slides beyond the index i, remove the element that falls out of this range from the map using its bucket ID to maintain only relevant comparisons.This implementation cleverly uses bucket sorting to reduce the complexity of checking each pair of indices in the naive approach. This ensures that each element is compared only with its immediate neighbors in a controlled bucket environment, optimizing the search for qualifying duplicate values. Adjusting the bucket storage dynamically as the index moves beyond k keeps the memory usage efficient and operations swift.
class Solution:
def calculate_bucket_id(self, value, width):
return value // width
def check_nearby_dupe(self, elements, range_limit, difference):
if difference < 0:
return False
hash_map = {}
bucket_width = difference + 1
for index in range(len(elements)):
current_bucket = self.calculate_bucket_id(elements[index], bucket_width)
if current_bucket in hash_map:
return True
if (current_bucket - 1 in hash_map and abs(elements[index] - hash_map[current_bucket - 1]) < bucket_width):
return True
if (current_bucket + 1 in hash_map and abs(elements[index] - hash_map[current_bucket + 1]) < bucket_width):
return True
hash_map[current_bucket] = elements[index]
if index >= range_limit:
del hash_map[self.calculate_bucket_id(elements[index - range_limit], bucket_width)]
return False
The Python solution involves checking whether any two indices in an array differ by at most a given value difference, and the values at those indices differing by at most range_limit. This problem is approached using a bucketing method.
calculate_bucket_id to compute the bucket number for each element in the array, based on the element's value and the bucket width.check_nearby_dupe, define a bucket width as difference + 1.True.True if any condition matches.range_limit, remove the oldest element from the dictionary to maintain the range boundary.False.This method uses a sliding window technique mapping elements to buckets to ensure efficient look-ups and maintain the conditions given by the problem constraints.