
Problem Statement
In this task, you are provided with an array of positive integers named arr
. Your objective is to modify the array through a series of permissible operations to meet certain conditions. The specific conditions that must be met are:
- The value of the first element in the array should be
1
. - The absolute difference between any two consecutive elements in the array must be at most
1
. This implies that for each elementi
(where1 <= i < arr.length
), the absolute differenceabs(arr[i] - arr[i-1])
should be less than or equal to1
.
To achieve this, you are allowed two kinds of operations:
- You can decrease the value of any element in the array to a smaller positive integer.
- You can rearrange the order of the elements in the array as needed.
The goal is to determine the maximum possible value of an element in the array after applying the aforementioned operations so that the conditions are satisfied.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
arr = [2,2,1,2,1]
Output:
2
Explanation:
We can satisfy the conditions by rearranging `arr` so it becomes `[1,2,2,2,1]`. The largest element in `arr` is 2.
Example 2
Input:
arr = [100,1,1000]
Output:
3
Explanation:
One possible way to satisfy the conditions is by doing the following: 1. Rearrange `arr` so it becomes `[1,100,1000]`. 2. Decrease the value of the second element to 2. 3. Decrease the value of the third element to 3. Now `arr = [1,2,3]`, whichsatisfies the conditions. The largest element in `arr is 3.`
Example 3
Input:
arr = [1,2,3,4,5]
Output:
5
Explanation:
The array already satisfies the conditions, and the largest element is 5.
Constraints
1 <= arr.length <= 105
1 <= arr[i] <= 109
Approach and Intuition
Considering the constraints and the allowable operations, the approach to solve the problem revolves around sorting and then appropriately adjusting the array values. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Start with the First Element:
- Ensure the first element is
1
since this is a strict requirement. Any higher value needs to be decreased to1
.
- Ensure the first element is
Sort the Array:
- By sorting, we can arrange the elements in increasing order, simplifying the process to adjust any larger gaps between successive elements.
Adjust Consecutive Differences:
- Once sorted, traverse from the second element onward, adjusting elements as necessary to ensure the difference condition
abs(arr[i] - arr[i-1]) <= 1
is maintained. Specifically, adjust the current element to be no more than one unit greater than its predecessor.
- Once sorted, traverse from the second element onward, adjusting elements as necessary to ensure the difference condition
Determine the Maximum Value:
- The maximum value in the adjusted array, after ensuring all conditions are satisfied, will generally be determined by the smallest values in the array and the number of elements. The farther you can go without breaching the difference condition, the higher the maximum value can be.
Example Insights:
- From the examples given, such as
[100, 1, 1000]
, it can be seen that sorting followed by adjusting values thoroughly (e.g., transforming it to[1, 2, 3]
) yields the longest stretch of incremental integers starting from1
. - It is essential to recognize that the adjustment is a cumulative process; each element is dependent on the adjustment of the previous element, especially after sorting.
By adhering to this clear, structured approach, the maximal element of the array, satisfying the given conditions, can be effectively determined.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
public:
int maxElementAfterModifying(vector<int>& input) {
int size = input.size();
vector<int> frequency = vector(size + 1, 0);
for (int element : input) {
frequency[min(element, size)]++;
}
int result = 1;
for (int index = 2; index <= size; index++) {
result = min(result + frequency[index], index);
}
return result;
}
};
The provided solution in C++ addresses the problem of finding the maximum element possible after rearranging and reducing a given array according to specific rules. The method maxElementAfterModifying is implemented to achieve this goal by first determining the frequency of elements up to the size of the input array. Then, it iteratively adjusts the maximum possible value considering how many times each value or lower can appear in a rearranged version of the array.
Steps involved in the solution:
- Calculate the size of the given input vector and create a frequency vector of size
size + 1
, initialized with zeros. - Iterate over the input vector to populate the frequency vector. Update the frequency of each element but ensure that elements larger than
size
are adjusted tosize
. - Initialize a variable
result
to 1, which will store the maximum element in the rearranged array. - Iterate through the frequency vector starting from index 2 up to
size
, adjusting theresult
based on the frequency of indices and ensuring it never surpasses the current index. - Return the calculated
result
.
This implementation efficiently computes the maximum possible element by making use of a frequency-based approach, ensuring linear time complexity relative to the size of the input. The use of vector operations and standard library functions in C++ aids in handling the data compactly and performing operations efficiently.
class Solution {
public int maxElementWithRearrange(int[] array) {
int size = array.length;
int[] frequency = new int[size + 1];
for (int value : array) {
frequency[Math.min(value, size)]++;
}
int maxPossible = 1;
for (int i = 2; i <= size; i++) {
maxPossible = Math.min(maxPossible + frequency[i], i);
}
return maxPossible;
}
}
The provided Java solution seeks to find the maximum element possible after reducing the elements of an array and rearranging them.
- Begin by defining the array length
size
. - Create an array
frequency
of sizesize+1
to store the frequency of occurrence of each element capped bysize
. - Iterate over the given array and populate the
frequency
array, ensuring if values are greater thansize
, they are capped tosize
. - Establish a variable
maxPossible
initialized to 1 to calculate the maximum potential value. - Traverse from the second element to the end of the frequency array.
- Update
maxPossible
within each iteration to be the minimum of itself incremented by the current indexed frequency or the current index. - The final value of
maxPossible
at the end of the loop will be the maximum possible value after reducing and rearranging the elements according to the prescribed conditions. - The function returns this value as the result.
By following these outlined steps, this Java function effectively determines the highest element achievable under the specified operations on the input array.
class Solution:
def maxElementPostModification(self, array: List[int]) -> int:
length = len(array)
frequencies = [0] * (length + 1)
for value in array:
frequencies[min(value, length)] += 1
result = 1
for value in range(2, length + 1):
result = min(result + frequencies[value], value)
return result
The Python program provided outlines a solution for finding the maximum possible element in an array after certain operations, where the array elements can be decreased and rearranged. The function maxElementPostModification
calculates this maximum value through the following detailed steps:
- Determine the length of the given array and initialize a frequency list of zeros that is one element larger than the array length.
- Populate the frequency list to count occurrences of each integer value in the array, but capped at the array's length to address maximum cut-off.
- Initialize a result variable starting at 1, as an array must have at least one element.
- Iteratively calculate possible values, updating the
result
variable by leveraging a combined check of incrementedresult
with the minimum between it and current range value, which considers rearranged positions. - The function returns
result
, representing the highest number attainable after enforcing the decrements and rearrangements as described by the problem constraints.
This method effectively helps in maximizing an element based on modified array conditions, using frequency counts and iterative checks for feasible maximum values.
No comments yet.