
Problem Statement
In this challenge, you are presented with a two-dimensional integer matrix named points
, indexed from 0. The matrix dimension is m x n
, where m
is the number of rows and n
is the number of columns. Starting with a score of zero, your goal is to maximize the score by selecting one cell from each row.
When you choose a cell (r, c)
in the matrix, the value points[r][c]
is added to your score. However, there's a catch: if the positions of the cells chosen in consecutive rows are too far apart horizontally, you incur a penalty. This penalty is calculated as the absolute difference between the column indices of the selected cells from two consecutive rows. Your task is to determine the maximum score possible after considering all additions and subtractions.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
points = [[1,2,3],[1,5,1],[3,1,1]]
Output:
9
Explanation:
The blue cells denote the optimal cells to pick, which have coordinates (0, 2), (1, 1), and (2, 0). You add 3 + 5 + 3 = 11 to your score. However, you must subtract abs(2 - 1) + abs(1 - 0) = 2 from your score. Your final score is 11 - 2 = 9.
Example 2
Input:
points = [[1,5],[2,3],[4,2]]
Output:
11
Explanation:
The blue cells denote the optimal cells to pick, which have coordinates (0, 1), (1, 1), and (2, 0). You add 5 + 3 + 4 = 12 to your score. However, you must subtract abs(1 - 1) + abs(1 - 0) = 1 from your score. Your final score is 12 - 1 = 11.
Constraints
m == points.length
n == points[r].length
1 <= m, n <= 105
1 <= m * n <= 105
0 <= points[r][c] <= 105
Approach and Intuition
Let's dissect the problem with the assistance of the provided examples and the stated constraints:
Understanding the Dynamics with Examples
In Example 1:
- Input matrix:
[[1,2,3],[1,5,1],[3,1,1]]
- The optimal path starts at the cell
(0, 2)
then goes to(1, 1)
and ends at(2, 0)
. - Total points collected:
3 (from points[0][2]) + 5 (from points[1][1]) + 3 (from points[2][0]) = 11
- The penalty incurred:
abs(2-1) + abs(1-0) = 2
from moving between selected cells. - Final score:
11 - 2 = 9
This demonstrates the need to balance between choosing high-value cells and minimizing the movement penalty between consecutive rows.
- Input matrix:
In Example 2:
- Input matrix:
[[1,5],[2,3],[4,2]]
- The optimal path starts at the cell
(0, 1)
then goes to(1, 1)
, and ends at(2, 0)
. - Total collected points:
5 + 3 + 4 = 12
- The penalty incurred:
abs(1-1) + abs(1-0) = 1
- Final score:
12 - 1 = 11
- Input matrix:
From these examples, we observe the following:
- Structural Understanding: The problem is inherently dynamic, where the optimum choice at each step relies on previous decisions.
- Dynamic Programming Strategy: Modeling this problem with a dynamic programming approach seems crucial. For every row
r
, and every possible column selectionc
, maintain the maximum possible score up to that point. Transition between states would consider all possible previous column choicesc'
from rowr-1
, maximizingpoints[r][c] - abs(c - c') + dp[r-1][c']
. - Initialization and Iteration: The first row serves as the base case where no penalty applies, and subsequent rows build upon previous computations.
- Efficient Computation and Pruning: Given the large size of
m
andn
(up to 105), optimizing the dynamic transitions and reducing redundant calculations is significant. Strategies like maintaining maximum and second maximum values from the previous row could be explored to reduce the time complexity per row transition.
In essence, understanding the penalty mechanism and designing an efficient state transition strategy are central to solving this problem optimally within given constraints.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
public:
long long maxScore(vector<vector<int>>& matrix) {
int nCols = matrix[0].size();
vector<long long> prevRow(nCols);
for (auto& row : matrix) {
long long maxLeft = 0;
// Traverse from left to right
for (int j = 0; j < nCols; ++j) {
maxLeft = max(maxLeft - 1, prevRow[j]);
prevRow[j] = maxLeft;
}
long long maxRight = 0;
// Traverse from right to left
for (int j = nCols - 1; j >= 0; --j) {
maxRight = max(maxRight - 1, prevRow[j]);
prevRow[j] = max(prevRow[j], maxRight) + row[j];
}
}
// Extract the maximum score
long long highestScore = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < nCols; ++j) {
highestScore = max(highestScore, prevRow[j]);
}
return highestScore;
}
};
Solve the maximum number of points with cost problem by implementing the maxScore
function in C++. Begin by determining the number of columns in the matrix using int nCols = matrix[0].size();
. Initialize a vector prevRow
to store intermediate results.
- Traverse each row in the matrix, updating
prevRow
with the accumulated maximum scores from the left and right directions to account for the cost constraints when moving to different columns. - For the left-to-right pass, use the local maximum
maxLeft
to update the values inprevRow
. - For the right-to-left pass, incorporate another local maximum
maxRight
to combine the results with those from the leftward pass, adding the current row values for the updated scores. - After processing all rows, determine the final maximum score by iterating through
prevRow
and finding the highest value.
Return the highest score as the output of the function to represent the maximum score attainable from the matrix configuration, considering all cost-impact movements between rows and columns. This approach ensures that every cell is evaluated for optimal paths from both directions, effectively accounting for the problem's constraints.
class Solution {
public long maximumPoints(int[][] grid) {
int width = grid[0].length;
long[] priorRow = new long[width];
for (int[] currentRow : grid) {
// Store the maximum findable value from previous iterations
long maxCarry = 0;
// Process from left to right
for (int i = 0; i < width; ++i) {
maxCarry = Math.max(maxCarry - 1, priorRow[i]);
priorRow[i] = maxCarry;
}
maxCarry = 0;
// Process from right to left
for (int i = width - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
maxCarry = Math.max(maxCarry - 1, priorRow[i]);
priorRow[i] = Math.max(priorRow[i], maxCarry) + currentRow[i];
}
}
// Determine the highest points obtainable in the last computed row
long totalMaxPoints = 0;
for (long point : priorRow) {
totalMaxPoints = Math.max(totalMaxPoints, point);
}
return totalMaxPoints;
}
}
The Java solution provided solves the problem of finding the maximum number of points you can obtain from a grid, where moving horizontally costs you points. The method maximumPoints
internally computes the solution utilizing a dynamic programming approach and optimizations for efficient horizontal traversal handling.
- Initialize a
priorRow
array with the same width as the grid to keep track of the maximum points that can be obtained up to each position. - Loop through each row of the grid and update the
priorRow
in two passes:- Left to Right Pass: Update
priorRow
values by considering the maximum point value that can be carried from the left side minus the cost of moving to the right. This pass ensures that the points from the left are considered. - Right to Left Pass: Similar to the first pass but from the right to the left. This pass makes sure that points from the right are maximized after considering points from the left, storing the best possible value plus the grid value itself.
- Left to Right Pass: Update
- Once all rows are processed, the final maximum points which can be obtained are determined by considering the maximum value in the
priorRow
after processing all rows.
Execute the example provided to integrate this strategy into broader applications where computing optimized paths or scores from 2D matrices is required, especially under constraints that mimic movement penalties.
class Solution:
def calculateMaxPoints(self, grid: List[List[int]]) -> int:
column_count = len(grid[0])
last_row_scores = [0] * column_count
for grid_row in grid:
max_from_left = 0
# Left to right calculation
for idx in range(column_count):
max_from_left = max(max_from_left - 1, last_row_scores[idx])
last_row_scores[idx] = max_from_left
max_from_right = 0
# Right to left calculation
for idx in range(column_count - 1, -1, -1):
max_from_right = max(max_from_right - 1, last_row_scores[idx])
last_row_scores[idx] = (
max(last_row_scores[idx], max_from_right) + grid_row[idx]
)
# Maximum points in the finalized row
return max(last_row_scores)
This Python solution tackles the problem of finding the maximum points achievable on a m x n grid, each cell containing a point value. At each position, you may choose points based on the cost from moving horizontally across any number of cells. The primary mechanism involves dynamic programming to optimize the results through the rows processing both from left-to-right and right-to-left.
- Initialize a
column_count
to the number of columns in the grid. - Prepare an array
last_row_scores
initialized to zero, with the length equal tocolumn_count
, to keep track of the maximum points obtainable until the current row. - Use a for-loop to traverse each row (
grid_row
) in the grid:- Initialize
max_from_left
to zero and iterate through indices from left to right. For each column, compare and updatemax_from_left
with the existing maximum reduced by one or the score fromlast_row_scores
at that column. Store the result back intolast_row_scores
. - After the left to right pass, initialize
max_from_right
to zero and iterate through indices from right to left. Updatemax_from_right
in a similar method and adjustlast_row_scores
at each index by adding the current grid value at that index. This step combines both directions' calculations to provide the optimal path value for each cell in a row.
- Initialize
- After processing all rows, the final maximum points obtainable is the maximum value from
last_row_scores
.
Execute the final line of code to return the maximum score from last_row_scores
. This implementation ensures each cell's maximum achievable score is computed considering the penalties from horizontal movements both from previous and next columns. By efficiently combining both left and right movements, the solution dynamically updates the potential maximum values row by row, leading to the optimal solution.
No comments yet.