
Problem Statement
This problem involves a hypothetical scenario where you have n
distinct piles of coins laid out on a table. Each pile contains a positive number of coins, but the number of coins and their values can vary from one pile to another. The coins in each pile are stacked such that you can only access one coin at a time from the top of the pile.
The ultimate goal here is to maximize the total value collected by picking exactly k
coins from these piles. However, the challenge lies in the fact that the coin picking must be done sequentially from the top of any chosen pile. You are supposed to decide strategically which coins to pick from which piles to ensure that the sum of the values of these k
coins is the highest possible.
We need to determine the combination of coins that yields the maximum total value for exactly k
selections, keeping in mind that each pick could potentially alter the available selections for subsequent picks.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
piles = [[1,100,3],[7,8,9]], k = 2
Output:
101
Explanation:
The above diagram shows the different ways we can choose k coins. The maximum total we can obtain is 101.
Example 2
Input:
piles = [[100],[100],[100],[100],[100],[100],[1,1,1,1,1,1,700]], k = 7
Output:
706
Explanation:
The maximum total can be obtained if we choose all coins from the last pile.
Constraints
n == piles.length
1 <= n <= 1000
1 <= piles[i][j] <= 105
1 <= k <= sum(piles[i].length) <= 2000
Approach and Intuition
Understanding the Dynamics:
- Each pile is structured such that only the top coin is accessible, making the problem inherently sequential in terms of access.
- The values of the coins can differ significantly, which might tempt the strategy to be more selective in choosing coins from piles where high-value coins are more readily accessible on the top.
Breakdown of Strategy:
Initial Observation:
- If
k
is equal to the total number of available coins, the strategy is straightforward: simply collect all the coins. - Conversely, if
k
is much smaller than the number of coins, a more selective approach is needed.
- If
Greedy Selection:
- Since the aim is to maximize the total value, a greedy approach where you always take the next highest-valued accessible coin seems intuitive. However, this approach might not be directly applicable due to the restricted access imposed by the stack-like nature of the piles.
Dynamic Programming (DP) Potential:
- A possible way to approach this could be using a dynamic programming technique, where the state
dp[i][j]
could represent the maximum value achievable by pickingj
coins from the firsti
piles.
- A possible way to approach this could be using a dynamic programming technique, where the state
Consideration of Piles Independently:
- Evaluate each pile independently to determine the maximum obtainable value for every possible number of picks from 1 to
k
. This involves simulating each possible number of picks for each pile and updating our belief about the best possible pick scenario after considering each additional pile.
- Evaluate each pile independently to determine the maximum obtainable value for every possible number of picks from 1 to
Combining Results:
- After independently evaluating piles, the next challenge is to integrate these evaluations. This can be done using several techniques, one of which might be additional layers of dynamic programming or sophisticated greedy algorithms that consider previous selections.
Intuitive Leap:
- By focusing on maximizing collected value at each stage, while not violating the stack access constraint, and continually updating the belief of what is achievable with each new pile or set of coins considered, we systematically hone in on the optimal solution.
- An element of this problem requires looking ahead and planning backward - understanding not just what can be maximally obtained now, but how current selections affect future options.
This structured approach should assist in navigating through the constraints and efficiently arriving at the solution that provides the maximum total value of k
coins picked from the given coin piles.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
public:
int maximumValue(vector<vector<int>>& piles, int k) {
int pileCount = piles.size();
vector<vector<int>> memo(pileCount + 1, vector<int>(k + 1, -1));
function<int(int, int)> getMaxValue = [&](int index, int remainingCoins) {
if (index == 0) {
return 0;
}
if (memo[index][remainingCoins] != -1) {
return memo[index][remainingCoins];
}
int sum = 0;
for (int usedCoins = 0; usedCoins <= min((int)piles[index - 1].size(), remainingCoins); usedCoins++) {
if (usedCoins > 0) {
sum += piles[index - 1][usedCoins - 1];
}
memo[index][remainingCoins] = max(memo[index][remainingCoins], getMaxValue(index - 1, remainingCoins - usedCoins) + sum);
}
return memo[index][remainingCoins];
};
return getMaxValue(pileCount, k);
}
};
This C++ solution tackles the problem of finding the maximum value achievable by selecting up to 'k' coins from multiple piles, where each coin in a pile has a different value. The approach utilizes dynamic programming along with recursion and memoization to store intermediate results and avoid recalculating them, which is essential for optimizing performance in problems involving state.
The way the solution works is as follows:
Define a 2D vector
memo
wherememo[i][j]
stores the maximum value you can obtain from the firsti
piles withj
coins left to choose. If the value is yet to be determined, it is initialized to -1.The core of the solution is the recursive function
getMaxValue
, which calculates the maximum value for a given number of remaining piles (index
) and remaining coins (remainingCoins
):Base Case: When no piles are left (
index
is 0), return 0 because no coins can be taken.For each pile, iterate over possible numbers of coins to take (
usedCoins
), ensuring not to exceed the actual number of coins in the pile or the total number of coins allowed (remainingCoins
). For every decision, accumulate the value of coins taken and use the recursive relation to find out the maximum value obtained by taking up tousedCoins
coins from this pile and the rest from the previous piles.Use memoization to save and retrieve calculated results of subproblems.
The function begins its computation from the last pile, trying to make optimal choices for each subproblem, and moves backwards to the first pile.
Upon exiting the recursive function,
getMaxValue(pileCount, k)
will provide the maximum value of coins from up tok
coins available across all piles.
This solution leverages memoization effectively to reduce the time complexity by avoiding redundant calculations, especially essential when working with considerable data sizes, such as in this problem of optimizing coin collection from multiple piles.
class Solution {
int memo[][];
private int calcMaxValue(List<List<Integer>> coinPiles, int index, int availableCoins) {
if (index == 0) {
return 0;
}
if (memo[index][availableCoins] != -1) {
return memo[index][availableCoins];
}
int sum = 0;
for (int takenCoins = 0; takenCoins <= Math.min(coinPiles.get(index - 1).size(), availableCoins); takenCoins++) {
if (takenCoins > 0) {
sum += coinPiles.get(index - 1).get(takenCoins - 1);
}
memo[index][availableCoins] = Math.max(memo[index][availableCoins], calcMaxValue(coinPiles, index - 1, availableCoins - takenCoins) + sum);
}
return memo[index][availableCoins];
}
public int maxCoinValue(List<List<Integer>> piles, int maxCoins) {
int pileCount = piles.size();
memo = new int[pileCount + 1][maxCoins + 1];
for (int i = 1; i <= pileCount; i++) {
for (int remainingCoins = 0; remainingCoins <= maxCoins; remainingCoins++) {
memo[i][remainingCoins] = -1;
}
}
return calcMaxValue(piles, pileCount, maxCoins);
}
}
The Java solution presented focuses on calculating the maximum value of coins one can collect from several piles with a limitation on the number of coins you can take. The approach utilizes dynamic programming to optimize the solution.
- The core of the solution lies in the
Solution
class containing a recursivecalcMaxValue
function, paired with a memoization table,memo
, to store intermediate results. - In
calcMaxValue
, the function first checks to see if the memoized result for the current subproblem exists. If it does, it returns that stored value to avoid redundant calculations. If not, it calculates the best value by iterating through all possible numbers of coins that can be taken from the current pile. - The recursion decreases the pile index and the number of available coins accordingly for each recursive call, while accumulating coin values to determine the maximum possible collection.
- In the
maxCoinValue
method, initialization of the memoization array ensures all values start unset (typically with-1
). This method sets up the memo array and kicks off the recursion starting from the last pile with all available coins. - The
maxCoinValue
method essentially invokescalcMaxValue
with the total number of piles and the total number of available coins, returning the maximum coin value possible under the constraints provided.
This solution effectively manages the exponential nature of exploring each combination of coins via dynamic programming with memoization, ensuring that the solution is computationally feasible even for larger inputs.
class Solution:
def computeMaxValue(self, piles: List[List[int]], k: int) -> int:
count_piles = len(piles)
memo = [[-1] * (k + 1) for _ in range(count_piles + 1)]
def dfs(idx, remaining):
if idx == 0:
return 0
if memo[idx][remaining] != -1:
return memo[idx][remaining]
total_value = 0
for taken in range(0, min(len(piles[idx - 1]), remaining) + 1):
if taken > 0:
total_value += piles[idx - 1][taken - 1]
memo[idx][remaining] = max(memo[idx][remaining],
dfs(idx - 1, remaining - taken) + total_value)
return memo[idx][remaining]
return dfs(count_piles, k)
This Python code defines a solution to determine the maximum value that can be collected from a collection of piles of coins, where you may choose up to k
coins. The implementation uses dynamic programming combined with memoization as an optimization over a simple brute force approach.
The solution class is named
Solution
with a functioncomputeMaxValue
which accepts a list of lists (piles
) where each sublist represents a pile of coins with varying values, and an integerk
, the maximum number of coins that can be picked.The
computeMaxValue
function first calculates the number of piles and initializes a 2D listmemo
to store intermediate values, reducing the redundancy of recomputing results for the same state. Each element inmemo
is initialized to-1
, which represents an uncomputed state.This function further includes a nested helper function
dfs
which uses Depth First Search technique to explore possible combinations of coins from different piles. The base case fordfs
checks if the pile index (idx
) is zero, where it returns zero since no coins can be taken from zero piles.The recursive computation checks previously computed results in
memo
to avoid re-computation. If not previously computed, it iterates over the number of coins that can be taken from the current pile (up to the minimum of pile size or remaining coin quotak
).For each possibility, the value collected by taking a certain number of coins from the pile is computed and added to the result of the recursive call with the remaining coin allowance. The maximum of these values is stored in the
memo
array.The recursion terminates when all piles have been considered, and the top-level function call to
dfs
returns the maximum value obtainable fork
coins. This value is then returned by thecomputeMaxValue
function.
Overall, the approach effectively uses memoization to optimize the recursive strategy, allowing the solution to handle larger inputs more efficiently. This is a common technique for problems involving optimal selection from sets (like coins here) under constraints (like the maximum k
coins here).
No comments yet.