
Problem Statement
In this problem, we are given a wooden stick of a specified length n
, marked from 0
to n
. Our task is to make several cuts on this stick at specified positions, (the positions are detailed in an array called cuts
). Each cut has an associated cost which is equivalent to the length of the stick that is being cut. Post-cut, the stick is divided into two smaller sticks, and the cumulative length remains unchanged. The objective is to determine the sequence of cuts that minimizes the total cost of all cuts made. It is vital to understand that the sum of the costs is not merely the lengths of where the cuts are made, but rather it relates to how much of the stick remains when each cut is made.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
n = 7, cuts = [1,3,4,5]
Output:
16
Explanation:
Using cuts order = [1, 3, 4, 5] as in the input leads to the following scenario: The first cut is done to a rod of length 7 so the cost is 7. The second cut is done to a rod of length 6 (i.e. the second part of the first cut), the third is done to a rod of length 4 and the last cut is to a rod of length 3. The total cost is 7 + 6 + 4 + 3 = 20. Rearranging the cuts to be [3, 5, 1, 4] for example will lead to a scenario with total cost = 16 (as shown in the example photo 7 + 4 + 3 + 2 = 16).
Example 2
Input:
n = 9, cuts = [5,6,1,4,2]
Output:
22
Explanation:
If you try the given cuts ordering the cost will be 25. There are much ordering with total cost <= 25, for example, the order [4, 6, 5, 2, 1] has total cost = 22 which is the minimum possible.
Constraints
2 <= n <= 106
1 <= cuts.length <= min(n - 1, 100)
1 <= cuts[i] <= n - 1
- All the integers in
cuts
array are distinct.
Approach and Intuition
This cutting problem can be approached to find the minimal total cost by using the concept of dynamic programming, driven by these notable strategies:
Sorting the Cuts:
- Start by sorting the array of cuts. This helps in easier management of sub-problems since cuts can be made in any order.
Using Dynamic Programming Table:
- Establish a dynamic programming table
dp
, wheredp[i][j]
represents the minimum cost to cut the stick segment fromi
toj
.
- Establish a dynamic programming table
Base Cases and Initialization:
- If there are no cuts between
i
andj
(i.e., the segment[i, j]
contains no positions listed incuts
), then no cost is incurred:dp[i][j] = 0
.
- If there are no cuts between
Filling DP Table:
- For each possible stick segment defined by
i
andj
, compute the minimal cost by considering each possible cutk
within that segment. The cost is the length of the segment, i.e., (j - i
), plus the cost of cutting the left and right segments formed after making the cut atk
.
- For each possible stick segment defined by
Divide and Conquer Strategy:
- The cost of adding to the current segment (
i
toj
) with possible cutk
is calculated as: dp[i][j] = min(dp[i][j], dp[i][k] + dp[k][j] + (j - i)) - It accumulates the costs of the two segments and the length of the current piece of the stick being cut.
- The cost of adding to the current segment (
Optimization:
- Given the constraints that the cuts can be between
1
andn-1
and the number of cuts is fairly modest, our DP approach will efficiently compute the minimum cost even in less optimal scenarios.
- Given the constraints that the cuts can be between
Final Result Extraction:
- Post computation,
dp[0][n]
holds the value for the minimum cost to execute all the necessary cuts on the entire length of the stick, starting from position 0 ton
.
- Post computation,
In summary, by sorting the cuts and dynamically programming the minimal costs of smaller segments step by step, this approach helps in breaking down the problem and computing an optimized solution to find the minimal total cost of cuts efficiently.
Solutions
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
int[][] dpTable;
int[] cutsModified;
private int computeCost(int start, int end) {
if (dpTable[start][end] != -1) {
return dpTable[start][end];
}
if (end - start == 1) {
return 0;
}
int minimumCost = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
for (int mid = start + 1; mid < end; mid++) {
int splitCost = computeCost(start, mid) + computeCost(mid, end) + cutsModified[end] - cutsModified[start];
minimumCost = Math.min(minimumCost, splitCost);
}
dpTable[start][end] = minimumCost;
return minimumCost;
}
public int minCost(int n, int[] cuts) {
int len = cuts.length;
cutsModified = new int[len + 2];
System.arraycopy(cuts, 0, cutsModified, 1, len);
cutsModified[len + 1] = n;
Arrays.sort(cutsModified);
dpTable = new int[len + 2][len + 2];
for (int i = 0; i <= len + 1; ++i) {
Arrays.fill(dpTable[i], -1);
}
return computeCost(0, cutsModified.length - 1);
}
}
This solution utilizes dynamic programming to solve the problem of minimizing the cost to cut a stick. Defined in Java, the class named Solution
contains methods to compute and return the minimal cutting cost.
Initialize an array
cutsModified
and a 2D arraydpTable
.cutsModified
holds the modified positions of cuts including the ends of the stick,dpTable
is used to store the cost of cutting the stick between indices. Each element indpTable
is initialized to -1 to denote that no calculation has been made yet.
The core logic is handled in the
computeCost
method, which computes the minimum cost of making cuts between two indices.- Base Case: If there's only one segment (difference between the end and start indices is 1), return a cost of 0.
- Recursive Case: Iteratively check the cost of making a cut at every possible position between
start
andend
. Calculate the total cost by adding the cost of left and right segments along with the cost of the current cut. UpdateminimumCost
if a cheaper option is found. - Memoization: Store the computed minimum cost in
dpTable
to avoid recalculating costs for the same indices.
In the
minCost
method:- Populate
cutsModified
with the provided cuts and the stick's total lengthn
. - Sort
cutsModified
for a sequenced approach in cutting. - Call
computeCost
passing the whole range to find the minimum cost for all cuts.
- Populate
This implementation ensures efficiency by leveraging memoization, preventing recalculation by storing the results of subproblems. Arrays are handled efficiently and only necessary data is computed, which is well suited for larger inputs and constraints.
class Solution:
def minimumCost(self, total_length: int, cut_positions: List[int]) -> int:
calculated_costs = {}
cut_positions = [0] + sorted(cut_positions) + [total_length]
def calculate_cost(start, end):
if (start, end) in calculated_costs:
return calculated_costs[(start, end)]
if end - start == 1:
return 0
minimum_cost = min(calculate_cost(start, mid) + calculate_cost(mid, end) + cut_positions[end] - cut_positions[start] for mid in range(start + 1, end))
calculated_costs[(start, end)] = minimum_cost
return minimum_cost
return calculate_cost(0, len(cut_positions) - 1)
The given Python code defines a solution to determine the minimum cost required to cut a stick into predefined parts. The program uses a memoized recursion for efficient cost calculation.
- You define a solution class with a method
minimumCost
that takes the total length of the stick and a list of positions where the cuts are to be made. - Start by initializing a dictionary
calculated_costs
to store previously calculated subproblems, which helps in reducing unnecessary calculations (memoization). - Amend the
cut_positions
list to include the start (0) and the end (total_length) of the stick. - The
calculate_cost
function is defined insideminimumCost
. It calculates the minimum cost to cut the stick between two positions,start
andend
.- If the cost has been calculated before, it returns the stored value.
- If
start
andend
are consecutive, no cut is required, and the cost is 0. - It calculates the cost by iterating from
start + 1
toend - 1
to find the optimal cut positionmid
that minimizes the cost of cutting the stick into two parts and adds the cost of making the cut.
- The entry point of recursion is
calculate_cost(0, len(cut_positions)-1)
, which calculates the cost for the whole stick. - The final return from the
minimumCost
method provides the minimum cost to completely separate the stick according to the cut positions provided.
No comments yet.