
Problem Statement
Given an integer array named nums
, you have up to three opportunities to change any single element of the array to any value of your choosing. The task is to determine the smallest possible difference between the highest and lowest values in the array after performing these alterations. In essence, you are trying to bring the elements closer together to minimize their range, using up to three moves.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
nums = [5,3,2,4]
Output:
0
Explanation:
We can make at most 3 moves. In the first move, change 2 to 3. nums becomes [5,3,3,4]. In the second move, change 4 to 3. nums becomes [5,3,3,3]. In the third move, change 5 to 3. nums becomes [3,3,3,3]. After performing 3 moves, the difference between the minimum and maximum is 3 - 3 = 0.
Example 2
Input:
nums = [1,5,0,10,14]
Output:
1
Explanation:
We can make at most 3 moves. In the first move, change 5 to 0. nums becomes [1,0,0,10,14]. In the second move, change 10 to 0. nums becomes [1,0,0,0,14]. In the third move, change 14 to 1. nums becomes [1,0,0,0,1]. After performing 3 moves, the difference between the minimum and maximum is 1 - 0 = 1. It can be shown that there is no way to make the difference 0 in 3 moves.
Example 3
Input:
nums = [3,100,20]
Output:
0
Explanation:
We can make at most 3 moves. In the first move, change 100 to 7. nums becomes [3,7,20]. In the second move, change 20 to 7. nums becomes [3,7,7]. In the third move, change 3 to 7. nums becomes [7,7,7]. After performing 3 moves, the difference between the minimum and maximum is 7 - 7 = 0.
Constraints
1 <= nums.length <= 105
-109 <= nums[i] <= 109
Approach and Intuition
To solve the problem of minimizing the range of values in the array with up to three modifications, we need to consider a few strategies based on the initial setup of the array:
Number of Modifications Relative to Array Size:
- If the array has three or fewer elements, it's possible to equalize all elements directly, resulting in a zero difference.
- If the array has more than three elements, then we must strategically select which elements to change.
Strategy for Reduction:
- Typically, reducing the gap involves either bringing the highest values down towards the median or lifting the lowest values up.
- When considering which moves will have the most substantial impact, look at bringing either the largest or the smallest values closer to the array's central range.
Sort the Array: By sorting the array, we can directly access the smallest and largest values. The sorted nature of the array also helps in understanding which elements (either on the extreme ends) will be candidates for alteration.
Minimize the Maximum or Maximize the Minimum:
- Assess the impact of removing the top three highest values versus the lowest three values. This helps in understanding the potential new range of the array.
- Specifically, calculate the difference between the fourth highest and the lowest value if we opt to decrease the top three values. Similarly, calculate the difference between the highest and the fourth lowest if we raise the bottom three values.
- Consider All Combinations of Three Changes:
- Since we are allowed up to three moves, consider combinations where you might not need to exclusively change the top most or bottom most. For instance, changing the highest, second highest, and the lowest value could yield a more minimized range than changing the top three consecutively. Thus, evaluating a few combinations based on sorted indices can give the optimal solution.
- Edge Cases: Check scenarios where the number of unique elements is less than four, or the frequencies of certain values dominate the array. In such cases, fewer moves might be required to optimize the outcome.
The solution will therefore iterate over possible combinations of three (or fewer) changes and calculate the potential minimum range achievable under those conditions, finally returning the smallest possible range.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
public:
int smallestDifference(vector<int>& arr) {
int arrSize = arr.size(), smallestDiff = INT_MAX;
if (arrSize <= 4) return 0;
// Sorting first 4 to make smallest
partial_sort(arr.begin(), arr.begin() + 4, arr.end());
// Getting the 4th largest in the remaining array
nth_element(arr.begin() + 4, arr.begin() + (arrSize - 4), arr.end());
// Sort the last four elements from end
sort(arr.begin() + (arrSize - 4), arr.end());
// Compute possible minimum differences
for (int startPos = 0, endPos = arrSize - 4; startPos < 4; startPos++, endPos++) {
smallestDiff = min(smallestDiff, arr[endPos] - arr[startPos]);
}
return smallestDiff;
}
};
The solution is a C++ implementation that aims to find the minimum difference between the largest and smallest values in an array after making up to three moves. Each move consists of modifying an element in the array.
The smallestDifference
function begins by checking the size of the array. If the array has four or fewer elements, the minimum difference after any moves is zero, as all elements can be potentially equalized.
Key steps in the function include:
- Using
partial_sort
to sort the first four elements of the array. This assists in evaluating potential smallest values more efficiently. - Applying
nth_element
to place the fourth largest element in its correct position had the entire array been sorted. This is necessary to correctly determine potential largest values. - Sorting the last four elements of the array ensures that the candidate elements for maximum values are easily accessible.
- Iterating from the start and the modified end of the array (reduced by four positions, accounting for the three moves) to compute the possible minimum differences. This is done by comparing elements from the sorted subarrays, ensuring the calculation of differences between some of the smallest and largest values.
The function works under the principle of making the largest reduction in the difference by adjusting elements at both extremes (smallest and largest values) of the sorted portions of the array.
In this approach, sorting and element manipulation techniques are combined to efficiently find the desired minimum difference with a maximum of three changes to the array.
public class Solution {
public int minimumDifference(int[] elements) {
int elementCount = elements.length;
if (elementCount <= 4) {
return 0;
}
PriorityQueue<Integer> descendingHeap = new PriorityQueue<>(Collections.reverseOrder());
for (int element : elements) {
descendingHeap.add(element);
if (descendingHeap.size() > 4) {
descendingHeap.remove();
}
}
List<Integer> fourSmallest = new ArrayList<>(descendingHeap);
Collections.sort(fourSmallest);
PriorityQueue<Integer> ascendingHeap = new PriorityQueue<>();
for (int element : elements) {
ascendingHeap.add(element);
if (ascendingHeap.size() > 4) {
ascendingHeap.remove();
}
}
List<Integer> fourLargest = new ArrayList<>(ascendingHeap);
Collections.sort(fourLargest);
int minimumDiff = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
minimumDiff = Math.min(minimumDiff, fourLargest.get(i) - fourSmallest.get(i));
}
return minimumDiff;
}
}
The given Java solution tackles the problem of finding the minimum difference between the largest and smallest values in an array after at most three modifications. The strategy involves using priority queues to efficiently extract the four smallest and four largest numbers from the array.
- Start by checking the number of elements. If there are four or fewer, return 0, as the difference can be minimized to zero by up to three moves.
- Utilize a max-heap (
PriorityQueue
with a reverse order) to find and store the four smallest elements. Iterate through the elements, adding each to the heap, and maintain only the four smallest by removing the top element if the heap size exceeds four. - Convert this max-heap into a sorted list
fourSmallest
. - Apply a similar approach with a min-heap (a regular priority queue) to gather the four largest elements. Like before, iterate, add each element to the heap, remove the top element if necessary, and sort the results into
fourLargest
. - Now, compute the minimum difference: Iterate through four indices to compare corresponding elements from
fourLargest
andfourSmallest
lists, updating the minimum difference accordingly.
This approach primarily leverages data structures that facilitate efficient retrieval and sorting operations, ensuring the solution is both effective and performant.
class Solution:
def minimumDifference(self, values: List[int]) -> int:
value_count = len(values)
if value_count <= 4:
return 0
lower_four = sorted(heapq.nsmallest(4, values))
upper_four = sorted(heapq.nlargest(4, values))
smallest_difference = float("inf")
for j in range(4):
smallest_difference = min(smallest_difference, upper_four[j] - lower_four[j])
return smallest_difference
In solving the problem of finding the minimum difference between the largest and smallest values in an array after up to three moves, the provided Python code effectively utilizes sorting and heap operations to efficiently calculate the solution. The function minimumDifference
accepts a list values
and operates by first checking the total number of elements. If there are four or fewer elements, the function returns 0
because the minimum difference can be reduced to zero by removing all but one element.
The crux of the solution involves:
- Extracting the smallest and largest four elements using
heapq.nsmallest
andheapq.nlargest
respectively, which are then sorted for straightforward computation. - Initializing
smallest_difference
to a very high value (float("inf")
) to ensure it captures the minimum possible value during subsequent operations. - Iterating through these four values and updating
smallest_difference
with the minimum of its current value and the difference between elements ofupper_four
andlower_four
at the same indices. By examining all possible outcomes with one to three elements removed, the calculation assures the closest gap possible between the remaining elements.
Follow this strategy to execute similar optimization tasks, focusing on conditional checks for trivial cases and efficient data structure operations for critical computational steps to handle larger inputs effectively.
No comments yet.