
Problem Statement
In this problem, we are presented with an undirected graph format that mimics the structure of a tree, which inherently has no cycles and is completely connected. The graph begins with n
nodes, labeled from 1
to n
, but deviates from being a typical tree due to an extra edge added among two distinct vertices chosen randomly. The graph is portrayed through an array edges
, where each element edges[i] = [ai, bi]
signifies an existing edge between the nodes ai
and bi
.
The task involves identifying and returning an edge which, once removed, would turn this potentially cyclic graph back into a perfect tree with n
nodes. If there are multiple valid edges to remove that satisfy this condition, the edge that appears last in the provided input array should be returned. This requirement adds an interesting challenge of ensuring not just the detection of a surplus edge leading to a cycle but also prioritizing edges based on their position in the input.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
edges = [[1,2],[1,3],[2,3]]
Output:
[2,3]
Example 2
Input:
edges = [[1,2],[2,3],[3,4],[1,4],[1,5]]
Output:
[1,4]
Constraints
n == edges.length
3 <= n <= 1000
edges[i].length == 2
1 <= ai < bi <= edges.length
ai != bi
- There are no repeated edges.
- The given graph is connected.
Approach and Intuition
The challenge lies in identifying an edge that, when removed, ensures that the graph no longer has any cycles and all n
nodes remain connected, effectively reverting it back to a tree.
Understanding Tree Properties:
- A tree with
n
nodes always hasn-1
edges. Since the graph is given as a tree with an additional edge, it means it hasn
edges. Therefore, exactly one edge must be causing a cycle.
- A tree with
Cycle Detection:
- To find out which edge to remove, we need to identify which edge is contributing to a cycle. This can often be achieved using a Disjoint Set (Union-Find) algorithm or Depth-First Search (DFS).
Using Union-Find:
- Initialize the disjoint set structure.
- Traverse through the list of edges and perform union operations. If a union operation between two nodes (that an edge connects) results in them being already connected, it means this edge is forming a cycle.
- The edge forming the cycle and appearing last should be our target for removal.
Examples Breakdown:
- For the example with
edges = [[1,2],[1,3],[2,3]]
, when attempting to union nodes2
and3
, we find they are already connected, indicating a cycle. This edge is returned as it's the last that forms a cycle. - Similarly, in
edges = [[1,2], [2,3], [3,4], [1,4], [1,5]]
, connecting nodes1
and4
completes a circle with the edge [1,4]; thus, removing it ensures the graph is a tree.
- For the example with
By following this approach, we can programmatically determine which edge to remove to restore the tree structure.
Solutions
- C++
class Solution {
class UnionFind {
private:
int size;
vector<int> rank;
vector<int> parent;
public:
// Constructor for the UnionFind structure.
UnionFind(int count) {
this->size = count;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
rank.push_back(1);
parent.push_back(i);
}
}
// Find method with path compression.
int find(int x) {
if (parent[x] != x) {
parent[x] = find(parent[x]);
}
return parent[x];
}
// Union method with rank optimization.
bool unionSets(int x, int y) {
int rootX = find(x);
int rootY = find(y);
if (rootX == rootY) {
return false;
}
if (rank[rootX] > rank[rootY]) {
parent[rootY] = rootX;
rank[rootX] += rank[rootY];
} else {
parent[rootX] = rootY;
rank[rootY] += rank[rootX];
}
return true;
}
};
public:
vector<int> findRedundantConnection(vector<vector<int>>& edges) {
int count = edges.size();
UnionFind uf(count);
for (const auto& edge : edges) {
if (!uf.unionSets(edge[0] - 1, edge[1] - 1)) {
return edge;
}
}
return {};
}
};
In the provided C++ solution for the "Redundant Connection" problem, the implementation uses the Union-Find data structure to detect a cycle in an undirected graph represented by connections between nodes. Here's how the solution handles the problem:
Union-Find Class Definition:
- An internal class,
UnionFind
, is defined to efficiently manage the union and find operations. - Variables for tracking the size (
size
), node ranks (rank
), and parents (parent
) of each node are included. - The constructor initializes the rank of each node to 1 and sets each node as its own parent.
- The
find
method employs path compression to keep the tree flat and speed up future operations. - The
unionSets
method includes rank optimization, ensuring that smaller trees are merged under larger trees, balancing the tree height and optimizing the path compression.
- An internal class,
Main Method Processing:
- The main method,
findRedundantConnection
, takes a list of edges and attempts to form a spanning tree. - It initializes the
UnionFind
object forn
nodes, wheren
is the number of edges, assuming that the input graph is connected. - For each edge in the input list:
- It tries to union the two endpoints of the edge (adjusting for 0-indexed
UnionFind
data structure). - If the
unionSets
method returnsfalse
, this indicates that adding the edge forms a cycle, making it redundant. This edge is immediately returned as the result.
- It tries to union the two endpoints of the edge (adjusting for 0-indexed
- If no redundant connection is found after processing all edges (although problem constraints guarantee at least one cycle), an empty list is returned.
- The main method,
Overall, the solution is efficient, with the union-find structure equipped with path compression and union by rank, ensuring near-constant time operations. The approach correctly identifies and returns the first edge that, if removed, would eliminate a cycle in the graph, thereby resolving the graph into a tree with n-1
edges where n
is the number of nodes.
- Java
class Solution {
class UnionFind {
private int count;
private int[] rank;
private int[] parent;
public UnionFind(int count) {
this.count = count;
rank = new int[count];
parent = new int[count];
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
rank[i] = 1;
parent[i] = i;
}
}
public int find(int node) {
if (parent[node] != node) {
parent[node] = find(parent[node]);
}
return parent[node];
}
public boolean union(int nodeA, int nodeB) {
int rootA = find(nodeA);
int rootB = find(nodeB);
if (rootA == rootB) {
return false;
}
if (rank[rootA] > rank[rootB]) {
parent[rootB] = rootA;
rank[rootA] += rank[rootB];
} else {
parent[rootA] = rootB;
rank[rootB] += rank[rootA];
}
return true;
}
}
public int[] findRedundantConnection(int[][] edges) {
int count = edges.length;
UnionFind uf = new UnionFind(count);
for (int[] edge : edges) {
if (!uf.union(edge[0] - 1, edge[1] - 1)) {
return edge;
}
}
return new int[] {}; // should not be reached if input is valid according to the problem description
}
}
In the code provided, a solution is implemented for finding a redundant connection in a graph. The approach employs the Union-Find algorithm. Here's a summary of how the code works:
UnionFind Class: This class is designed to manage disjoined sets of nodes. It primarily offers two operations:
- find(): Determines the root of a node, employing path compression to improve efficiency.
- union(): Joins two nodes. If the nodes are connected to the same root, it means adding the connection would form a cycle, which returns
false
; otherwise, the nodes are united under one root.
findRedundantConnection Method:
- Initializes a UnionFind object for the node count obtained from the length of the
edges
array. - Iteratively attempts to union nodes from each edge.
- If the union operation fails (indicating a cycle), returns the current edge as the redundant connection.
- Initializes a UnionFind object for the node count obtained from the length of the
This implementation is effective for graphs represented by edge lists and efficiently identifies cycles using the Union-Find structure with path compression and union by rank methodologies. This ensures that each operation remains nearly constant, even for large graphs. The expected return for this function should be the first edge contributing to any cycle it finds, making this the "redundant connection" in the context of the graph.
- Python
class DisjointSetUnion:
def __init__(self, size):
self.size = size
self.sizes = [1] * size
self.parents = list(range(size))
def find(self, x):
if self.parents[x] != x:
self.parents[x] = self.find(self.parents[x]) # Path compression
return self.parents[x]
def union(self, x, y):
rootX = self.find(x)
rootY = self.find(y)
if rootX != rootY:
if self.sizes[rootX] > self.sizes[rootY]:
self.parents[rootY] = rootX
self.sizes[rootX] += self.sizes[rootY]
else:
self.parents[rootX] = rootY
self.sizes[rootY] += self.sizes[rootX]
return True
return False
class ProblemSolution:
def findRedundantConnection(self, edges):
num_nodes = len(edges)
dsu = DisjointSetUnion(num_nodes)
for u, v in edges:
if not dsu.union(u - 1, v - 1):
return [u, v]
return []
The code provided solves the "Redundant Connection" problem using a Disjoint Set Union (DSU) data structure in Python. Here's a briefing on how the code works:
First, the
DisjointSetUnion
class is defined, which helps in managing the union and find operations efficiently:- Initialization: The constructor initializes each node to be its own parent, and sets the size of each component to 1.
- Find Operation: Implements path compression to speed up future operations.
- Union Operation: Joins two components. If they were already connected, it skips merging and thus helps in identifying a redundant connection by returning
False
.
The
ProblemSolution
class contains the methodfindRedundantConnection
:- It initializes an instance of
DisjointSetUnion
with a number of nodes equal to the length of the input edge list. - Iterates over each edge and attempts to union the two nodes involved in the edge. If the union operation returns
False
, it indicates a redundant connection which is then returned.
- It initializes an instance of
This method will efficiently find and return the redundant connection in the edge list that makes it possible to form a cycle in an undirected graph. If no redundant connection exists, it returns an empty list. This approach leverages the efficiency of the DSU to ensure the solution is optimal and can handle large graphs effectively.
No comments yet.