
The problem presents us with an array of intervals, with each interval defined by a pair [li, ri). Here, li and ri represent the inclusive start and exclusive end of the interval respectively. Our task is to identify how many of such intervals are not covered by any other interval in the list. An interval [a, b) is said to be covered by another interval [c, d) if c is less than or equal to a, and b is less than or equal to d. Ultimately, we need to return the count of intervals that remain after removing all covered intervals.
Input:
Output:
Explanation:
Input:
Output:
1 <= intervals.length <= 1000intervals[i].length == 20 <= li < ri <= 105The provided examples help in understanding the problem more clearly:
Example 1:
For intervals [[1,4], [3,6], [2,8]]:
[3,6] is wholly within [2,8]. Hence, [3,6] is covered and removed.[1,4] and [2,8] remain, leading to an output of 2.Example 2:
For intervals [[1,4], [2,3]]:
[2,3] lies completely within [1,4], so [2,3] is covered and removed.[1,4] remains, leading to an output of 1.From the examples, we deduce the general approach:
Sorting: Start by sorting the intervals based on their starting point li. In case of a tie, prioritize intervals by the ending point ri in descending order. This helps us in having a structured way to identify covering intervals.
Comparison Algorithm: Use a double pointer or iteration technique:
maxEnd, to keep track of the farthest point an interval has covered.ri, is less than maxEnd, it's entirely covered by the previously considered intervals, and hence can be discarded.maxEnd whenever you encounter an interval that extends it.Count the Uncovered Intervals: Every time an interval is considered and isn't covered, increment a counter.
This approach assesses each interval at most once in the sorted order, ensuring an efficient solution. The constraints allow tying this approach feasibly, given that up to 1000 intervals can be processed within acceptable time frames.
The given C++ solution focuses on analyzing a list of intervals and counting the number of intervals that are not covered by other intervals. The goal is to determine how many intervals remain after removing those that are entirely covered by others.
Solution Approach:
First, the intervals are sorted based on their starting point. If two intervals have the same starting point, the one with the longer duration (or later end point) is considered first. This sorting facilitates the later step of determining coverage between consecutive intervals.
Initialize totalCount to count the non-overlapping intervals and lastCoveredEnd to keep track of where the last considered interval ends.
Iterate through each interval in the sorted list:
lastCoveredEnd. If true, this interval is not covered by any prior interval and should be counted as a non-overlapping interval.lastCoveredEnd to the end point of the current interval when it extends beyond the last recorded end point.The function finally returns totalCount, which reflects the number of non-covered intervals in the original list.
This method ensures efficient coverage check by first sorting the intervals and then comparing each interval's end with the highest end point found so far. The algorithm is optimized for both time and space due to its linear pass through the sorted intervals and constant space overhead.
0 Comments
Be the first to comment and share your perspective with the community.