
Problem Statement
Given an integer array nums
and a target integer k
, the challenge is to return the length of the shortest subarray within nums
whose elements sum up to at least k
. If no subarray meets this criteria, the function should return -1
. It is important to note that a subarray in this context refers to a contiguous subset of the array elements. Understanding the dynamics of subarrays and their cumulative sums relative to k
is central to solving this problem efficiently.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
nums = [1], k = 1
Output:
1
Example 2
Input:
nums = [1,2], k = 4
Output:
-1
Example 3
Input:
nums = [2,-1,2], k = 3
Output:
3
Constraints
1 <= nums.length <= 105
-105 <= nums[i] <= 105
1 <= k <= 109
Approach and Intuition
Understanding the Problem: The objective is to find the minimum contiguous subsequence in the
nums
array, which adds up to at leastk
. The problem can be challenging due to the varying values ofnums
(which can be negative or positive) andk
.Brute-force Approach (Inefficient):
- You could begin by calculating the sum of every possible subarray and checking if it meets or exceeds
k
. This approach would be straightforward but inefficient, especially for large arrays, due to its O(n^2) time complexity.
- You could begin by calculating the sum of every possible subarray and checking if it meets or exceeds
Optimal Approach (Using Sliding Window/Two Pointers):
- Utilize a form of the sliding window technique to find the shortest subarray sum efficiently. More specifically, this problem can be seen as a variation of the 'minimum size subarray sum' problem.
- Keep expanding the window (subarray) by moving the right pointer and adding to the current sum until the sum is at least
k
. - Once you find such a subarray, try to contract the window from the left to see if there's a shorter subarray that still meets the condition; all the while updating the minimum length.
- Progress the left pointer of the window to potentially reduce the size until the sum falls below
k
, then repeat the process of expanding the right pointer.
Edge Cases:
- If
nums
only contains one element and this element is equal to or greater thank
, the result is1
(length of the subarray). - If all elements combined are less than
k
, or ifk
is exceptionally high relative to the array values, the function should return-1
, indicating no valid subarray exists.
- If
Visualization Through Examples:
- Given
[1], k=1
, the shortest subarray is[1]
itself, so the output should be1
. - Given
[1,2], k=4
, you can't form a subarray with sum at least4
, so the output is-1
. - For
[2,-1,2], k=3
, despite having a negative number, the entire array is needed to achieve the sum of3
. Hence, the output is the length of the whole array,3
.
- Given
Understanding these basic approaches and modifying the two-pointer technique to accommodate the problem specifics of summing to at least k
is essential. This underscores the challenge and the computational efficiency needed for handling larger inputs within provided constraints.
Solutions
- C++
class Solution {
public:
int minSubarrayLength(vector<int>& array, int threshold) {
int len = array.size();
vector<long long> cumulativeSum(len + 1, 0);
// Generating prefix sums
for (int idx = 1; idx <= len; idx++) {
cumulativeSum[idx] = cumulativeSum[idx - 1] + array[idx - 1];
}
deque<int> indices;
int minimalLength = INT_MAX;
for (int i = 0; i <= len; i++) {
// Remove elements from deque that enable threshold achievement
while (!indices.empty() && cumulativeSum[i] - cumulativeSum[indices.front()] >= threshold) {
minimalLength = min(minimalLength, i - indices.front());
indices.pop_front();
}
// Maintain a deque that is increasing with respect to cumulative sum values
while (!indices.empty() && cumulativeSum[i] <= cumulativeSum[indices.back()]) {
indices.pop_back();
}
// Include current index in deque
indices.push_back(i);
}
// If no valid subarray is found, return -1
return minimalLength == INT_MAX ? -1 : minimalLength;
}
};
The provided CPP code aims to solve the problem of finding the shortest subarray's length with a sum equal to or exceeding a specified threshold in a given array. The solution utilizes a combination of prefix sums and a double-ended queue (deque) to efficiently manage and update the cumulative sums during iteration.
Prefix Sum Computation: The code first computes the cumulative sum of the elements in the array, storing these sums in a vector. This step is crucial as it allows the calculation of any subarray's sum in constant time.
Double-ended Queue (Deque) Usage: The deque is used to store indices of the array in a manner that the cumulative sums at these indices are in increasing order. This strategy is key for efficiently evaluating which parts of the array contribute to the sum reaching or exceeding the threshold.
Two Main Operations in the Loop:
- If the difference between the cumulative sum at the current index and the cumulative sum at the index at the front of the deque is at least the threshold, update the shortest length and remove the front index from the deque.
- Ensure that the deque remains oriented with increasing cumulative sums. If the current cumulative sum is less than the one at the back of the deque, remove the back index until the deque is correctly ordered again and then add the current index.
Result Evaluation: At the end of iteration through the array, if no subarray meets or exceeds the threshold, the function returns
-1
. If at least one subarray meets the criteria, the function returns the length of the shortest such subarray.
Through clever use of data structures and careful control of the computational complexity, this code efficiently solves the problem without needing to check each possible subarray explicitly. This results in a more scalable solution, suitable for handling larger input sizes.
- Java
class Solution {
public int findShortestSubarrayLength(int[] elements, int desiredSum) {
int length = elements.length;
// Prepares to calculate cumulative sums
long[] cumulativeSums = new long[length + 1];
// Generate all cumulative sums
for (int idx = 1; idx <= length; idx++) {
cumulativeSums[idx] = cumulativeSums[idx - 1] + elements[idx - 1];
}
Deque<Integer> indexDeque = new ArrayDeque<>();
int minSubarrayLength = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
// Traverse each cumulative sum
for (int current = 0; current <= length; current++) {
// Process potential indices where subarrays start
while (
!indexDeque.isEmpty() &&
cumulativeSums[current] - cumulativeSums[indexDeque.peekFirst()] >=
desiredSum
) {
minSubarrayLength = Math.min(
minSubarrayLength,
current - indexDeque.pollFirst()
);
}
// Remove larger sums to keep deque monotonic
while (
!indexDeque.isEmpty() &&
cumulativeSums[current] <= cumulativeSums[indexDeque.peekLast()]
) {
indexDeque.pollLast();
}
// Add current index as a possible start point
indexDeque.offerLast(current);
}
// Check if a valid subarray was found
return minSubarrayLength == Integer.MAX_VALUE
? -1
: minSubarrayLength;
}
}
In this solution summary, explore the implementation details for finding the shortest subarray with a sum at least K
in a given array using Java. The approach employs a sliding window technique facilitated by a deque (double-ended queue) to efficiently track the potential minimum length subarrays that meet or exceed the target sum.
Here's an overview of how the Java solution operates:
Initialize Data Structures: Begin by setting up an array to hold cumulative sums starting from the head of the array. This prepares you to quickly calculate any subarray sum. Additionally, initialize a deque to assist in tracking the indices of interest for potential subarrays.
Calculate Cumulative Sums: Compute the cumulative sums for the array such that each entry at index
i
in the new cumulative sum array represents the sum of the elements from the start up to the element at indexi - 1
in the original array.Process Each Element: Traverse through each cumulative sum. For each element in the cumulative sums:
- While the deque is not empty and the difference between the current cumulative sum and the cumulative sum at the index represented by the front of the deque is greater than or equal to
K
, update the minimum length of the subarray. - Continuously remove elements from the back of the deque if the current cumulative sum is less than or equal to the cumulative sum at the index represented by the back of the deque. This step maintains the deque's property of storing indices in increasing order of their cumulative sums.
- Append the current index to the deque as it might be the start of a possible shortest subarray meeting the required sum.
- While the deque is not empty and the difference between the current cumulative sum and the cumulative sum at the index represented by the front of the deque is greater than or equal to
Handle No Valid Subarray: After processing all elements, if the minimum subarray length remains unchanged from the initialized value (indicating that no valid subarray was found), return
-1
. Otherwise, return the length of the shortest subarray found.
This implementation offers an efficient way of solving the problem by leveraging the properties of cumulative sums and using a deque to maintain a running window of potential subarray starts. This ensures that the solution operates within optimal time complexity constraints, making it suitable for large arrays.
- Python
class Solution:
def findMinSubarrayLen(self, array: List[int], needed_sum: int) -> int:
array_length = len(array)
sum_up_to = [0] * (array_length + 1)
for idx in range(1, array_length + 1):
sum_up_to[idx] = sum_up_to[idx - 1] + array[idx - 1]
indices = deque()
min_length = float("inf")
for current in range(array_length + 1):
while (indices and sum_up_to[current] - sum_up_to[indices[0]] >= needed_sum):
min_length = min(min_length, current - indices.popleft())
while (indices and sum_up_to[current] <= sum_up_to[indices[-1]]):
indices.pop()
indices.append(current)
return min_length if min_length != float("inf") else -1
The provided Python solution addresses the problem of finding the length of the shortest contiguous subarray where the sum of its elements is at least a given value k
. Utilize a sliding window combined with a deque to efficiently determine the minimum length that satisfies this condition. Below is a conceptual understanding to execute this solution effectively:
- First, calculate prefix sums for the array, which helps in obtaining the sum of any subarray in constant time.
- Use a deque to store indices of these prefix sums in an increasing order. This assists in quickly finding the minimum subarray length that meets or exceeds the needed sum.
- As you iterate through each prefix sum:
- Remove indices from the front of the deque when the difference between current prefix sum and the prefix sum at the deque's front index is greater than or equal to the needed sum. Update the minimum length each time such a subarray is found.
- Also, maintain the deque in such a way that prefix sums are in increasing order. This is crucial because a smaller prefix sum that comes later could potentially form a subarray that meets the required sum condition with a future element.
If no valid subarray is found, the function returns -1. Otherwise, it returns the length of the shortest such subarray. This solution efficiently handles various array scenarios by ensuring that each element is processed in a way that maintains or improves the current best solution for the shortest subarray length. Remember to ensure edge cases like empty arrays or sums that cannot be met by any subarrays are handled gracefully.
No comments yet.