
Problem Statement
In a system that mimics a CPU scheduler, you're provided with an array of tasks labeled from 'A' to 'Z'. Along with this array, you are also given a number n
representing the minimum number of intervals required to wait before a task can be repeated. Each interval, a task is either performed or the CPU remains idle. The sequence of task execution is flexible as long as the above constraint (waiting time between the same tasks) is adhered to. Your objective is to determine the minimum number of such intervals required to complete all tasks from the array.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
tasks = ["A","A","A","B","B","B"], n = 2
Output:
8
Explanation:
A possible sequence is: A -> B -> idle -> A -> B -> idle -> A -> B. After completing task A, you must wait two intervals before doing A again. The same applies to task B. In the 3rd interval, neither A nor B can be done, so you idle. By the 4th interval, you can do A again as 2 intervals have passed.
Example 2
Input:
tasks = ["A","C","A","B","D","B"], n = 1
Output:
6
Explanation:
A possible sequence is: A -> B -> C -> D -> A -> B. With a cooling interval of 1, you can repeat a task after just one other task.
Example 3
Input:
tasks = ["A","A","A", "B","B","B"], n = 3
Output:
10
Explanation:
A possible sequence is: A -> B -> idle -> idle -> A -> B -> idle -> idle -> A -> B. There are only two types of tasks, A and B, which need to be separated by 3 intervals. This leads to idling twice between repetitions of these tasks.
Constraints
1 <= tasks.length <= 104
tasks[i]
is an uppercase English letter.0 <= n <= 100
Approach and Intuition
This problem can be understood and tackled efficiently by considering the frequency and the required cooling period (given by n
) of the tasks:
Task Frequency Calculation:
Start by counting how many times each task appears in the list. This helps in understanding which tasks are most frequent and might require more idling intervals ifn
is relatively high.Simulate Task Execution:
The key is to determine an efficient sequence of task execution that adheres to the cooling period. This involves scheduling the most frequent tasks as far apart as allowed byn
, while filling in the gaps with other less frequent tasks, or idling if no other task is eligible to run.Efficient Scheduling Using a Priority Queue:
- Use a priority queue (or max heap) to always execute the task with the highest remaining count first.
- After executing a task, decrease its count and, if it still needs to be executed in the future, "cool" it down for
n
intervals by temporarily moving it out of the priority queue. - During the cooling period, choose the next available task with the highest count.
- If no tasks are available to execute (i.e., they are all cooling down), the CPU must be idle.
Handling the Last Batch of Tasks:
- There might be a scenario towards the end where the only tasks left are all in their cooling period. This will necessitate the CPU being idle for several intervals even if the task list is technically exhausted except for these cooling down tasks.
The given examples in the prompt illustrate how the length of n
dramatically affects the task scheduling, showing the necessity to idle in certain situations to respect the cooling period. Each example highlights a possible scheduling sequence, demonstrating how to intersperse idling and task executions effectively.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
public:
int leastInterval(vector<char>& tasks, int n) {
// count frequency of each task
int taskFreq[26] = {0};
int maxFreq = 0;
// Determine the highest frequency of any task
for (char task : tasks) {
taskFreq[task - 'A']++;
maxFreq = max(maxFreq, taskFreq[task - 'A']);
}
// Calculate initial slots needed excluding the last maximum frequency tasks
int totalSlots = (maxFreq - 1) * (n + 1);
for (int count : taskFreq) {
if (count == maxFreq) {
totalSlots++;
}
}
// The result is either the task list size or calculated slots, whichever is larger
return max((int)tasks.size(), totalSlots);
}
};
The provided C++ solution addresses the problem of finding the minimum number of intervals needed to execute a list of tasks, each with a certain cooldown period (n
intervals between two same tasks). The solution uses an array-based approach to calculate the frequency of each task and then determines the optimal task scheduling.
Solution approach:
- Create an array
taskFreq
to hold the frequency of each possible task (assumed 26 different tasks corresponding to letters of the alphabet). This initialization sets all values to zero. - Iterate over the input list of tasks to populate the
taskFreq
array and simultaneously determine the maximum frequency (maxFreq
) of any task. This helps in understanding the most frequent task that would potentially maximize the cooldown constraint. - Compute the initial number of slots required (
totalSlots
) based only on the most frequent task's scheduling pattern excluding its last instance. This is calculated as(maxFreq - 1) * (n + 1)
. - Count the tasks having the same maximum frequency to finalize the
totalSlots
. If multiple tasks have the maximum frequency, each such task adds to the required total slots. - Finally, the minimum number of time intervals required is the greater value between the length of the tasks array and
totalSlots
. This ensures that all tasks are accounted for within the defined constraints.
This approach efficiently ensures that the task scheduling adheres to the cooldown period, thus optimizing the task execution timeline with the given conditions. The solution considers both space and time complexity in its approach, optimal for large task lists with cooldown constraints.
class Scheduler {
public int calculateTime(char[] tasks, int n) {
int[] frequency = new int[26];
int maxFreq = 0;
for (char task : tasks) {
frequency[task - 'A']++;
maxFreq = Math.max(maxFreq, frequency[task - 'A']);
}
int totalDuration = (maxFreq - 1) * (n + 1);
for (int count : frequency) {
if (count == maxFreq) {
totalDuration++;
}
}
return Math.max(tasks.length, totalDuration);
}
}
The Task Scheduler solution in Java involves determining the minimum time required to execute a list of tasks with a cooldown period between tasks of the same type. Follow this walkthrough of the code implementation provided:
- Define a class
Scheduler
. - Implement the method
calculateTime
which takes an array of characters representing tasks and an integern
representing the cooldown period. - Initialize an array
frequency
of size 26 to keep track of the frequencies of each task. - Define a variable
maxFreq
to store the maximum frequency of any task. - Iterate over the tasks array increasing the frequency of each task in the
frequency
array; simultaneously updatemaxFreq
if the current task's frequency exceeds it. - Calculate the
totalDuration
for the tasks considering cooldown using the formula(maxFreq - 1) * (n + 1)
. - Another loop over the
frequency
array checks for tasks that appear with the same frequency asmaxFreq
and incrementstotalDuration
for each such task. - The method returns the maximum value between
tasks.length
andtotalDuration
, ensuring that the result accounts both for cooldown constraints and the total number of tasks.
This implementation effectively calculates when tasks are executed with their cooldowns, delivering an efficient scheduling to minimize the time taken.
class Solution:
def scheduleTasks(self, tasks: List[str], interval: int) -> int:
# Array to store the frequency of occurrence of each task
frequency = [0] * 26
highest_freq = 0
# Calculating frequency of each task and finding the max frequency
for task in tasks:
index = ord(task) - ord('A')
frequency[index] += 1
highest_freq = max(highest_freq, frequency[index])
# Formula to compute the minimal time required
min_time = (highest_freq - 1) * (interval + 1)
for count in frequency:
if count == highest_freq:
min_time += 1
# Ensure the return time is at least the number of tasks
return max(min_time, len(tasks))
This Python solution efficiently schedules tasks with cooling intervals using a greedy algorithm. The function scheduleTasks
in the Solution
class takes a list of tasks and an interval as arguments and returns the minimum time needed to complete all tasks without violating the cooling period constraint.
- The solution first initializes a frequency list to count occurrences of each task.
- It then iterates over tasks to populate the frequency list and determines the task that appears the most, referred to as
highest_freq
. - Employing the core formula
(highest_freq - 1) * (interval + 1)
, it calculates the minimal time by considering the intervals and adjusting for instances where multiple tasks share the highest frequency. - Finally, it ensures the returned time is at least the number of tasks, accounting for scenarios where the interval does not influence the schedule.
Optimization adheres to algorithmic efficiency standards and directly addresses the core challenge without unnecessary computation overload. Edit the task list or interval in the scheduleTasks
call to see how the schedule adapulates.
No comments yet.