
Problem Statement
The task involves computing the number of ways to construct an array of size n such that each element in the array is an integer between 1 to m inclusive. Moreover, the array construction process has a unique measure known as search_cost which must equal a specified integer k after an unspecified algorithm is applied. It's required that the solutions count must be returned modulo 10^9 + 7 to manage large numbers effectively.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
n = 2, m = 3, k = 1
Output:
6
Explanation:
The possible arrays are [1, 1], [2, 1], [2, 2], [3, 1], [3, 2] [3, 3]
Example 2
Input:
n = 5, m = 2, k = 3
Output:
0
Explanation:
There are no possible arrays that satisfy the mentioned conditions.
Example 3
Input:
n = 9, m = 1, k = 1
Output:
1
Explanation:
The only possible array is [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
Constraints
1 <= n <= 501 <= m <= 1000 <= k <= n
Approach and Intuition
The provided examples, along with the problem constraints, offer a clue to what the search_cost might be implying, although the specific algorithm for calculating search_cost is not directly mentioned.
Here is the observed logic inferred from the examples:
For the pairs (n = 2, m = 3, k = 1), all combinations where the array configuration gives a
search_costof 1 are:- [1, 1]
- [2, 1]
- [2, 2]
- [3, 1]
- [3, 2]
- [3, 3]
Here, it seems that the maximum number (or perhaps the number of times it occurs) plays into what is considered the cost, since having multiple instances or the highest value filled arrays still meet some condition.
The pair (n = 5, m = 2, k = 3) results in a count of 0, suggesting that within the arrays possible under those constraints (n elements each between 1 and m), there's no configuration that would yield a
search_costof 3. This hints that perhaps the configurations where the maximality or frequency of maximum has to achieve a certain setup or count are nonexistent with these bounds.Finally, the array of n = 9 and m = 1 with the only array possible being [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] and
search_costk = 1 indicates that when the array is homogeneous with the single possible value of m, thesearch_costnaturally achieves a minimal level.
The observations suggest that search_cost may be quantifying something about the frequency or distribution of the maximal element within the array, and how that relates to k. The exact nature of the algorithm could potentially be explored further via dynamic programming or combinatorial methods, particularly focusing on how changes in element repetition or ordering towards the maximum value influence this search_cost.
The constraints given also bound the problem space up to reasonable computational limits, suggesting that solutions should feasibly run within these bounds considering modern computational capabilities:
- Maximum of 50 elements in an array.
- Values of array elements not exceeding 100.
- Search cost
knot surpassing the number of elementsn.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- Python
class Solution {
public:
int countWays(int n, int m, int k) {
long long current[m + 1][k + 1];
long long currentSum[m + 1][k + 1];
long long previous[m + 1][k + 1];
long long prevSum[m + 1][k + 1];
memset(current, 0, sizeof(current));
memset(currentSum, 0, sizeof(currentSum));
memset(previous, 0, sizeof(previous));
memset(prevSum, 0, sizeof(prevSum));
int MODULO = 1000000007;
for (int number = 1; number <= m; number++) {
current[number][1] = 1;
}
for (int idx = 1; idx <= n; idx++) {
if (idx > 1) {
memset(current, 0, sizeof(current));
}
memset(currentSum, 0, sizeof(currentSum));
for (int maxValue = 1; maxValue <= m; maxValue++) {
for (int complexity = 1; complexity <= k; complexity++) {
long long value = (maxValue * previous[maxValue][complexity]) % MODULO;
value = (value + prevSum[maxValue - 1][complexity - 1]) % MODULO;
current[maxValue][complexity] += value;
current[maxValue][complexity] %= MODULO;
currentSum[maxValue][complexity] = (currentSum[maxValue - 1][complexity] + current[maxValue][complexity]);
currentSum[maxValue][complexity] %= MODULO;
}
}
for (int maxValue = 0; maxValue <= m; maxValue++) {
for (int complexity = 0; complexity <= k; complexity++) {
previous[maxValue][complexity] = current[maxValue][complexity];
prevSum[maxValue][complexity] = currentSum[maxValue][complexity];
}
}
}
return currentSum[m][k];
}
};
The provided code in C++ is a solution to the problem of building an array where you can find the maximum element exactly k times using dynamic programming. Here is a concise explanation of how the code functions:
Start by defining four 2D arrays:
current,currentSum,previous, andprevSum, and initialize them to zero. ThecurrentandcurrentSumarrays store temporal values during computation before transferring them topreviousandprevSum, respectively.Establish a
MODULOconstant set to1000000007(a large prime number used to avoid integer overflow).Initialize the base case for when the number of comparisons (
k) is one. Ifkequals one, any element by itself will reach this condition.Nested looping structure:
- The outermost loop iterates over each position
idxfrom 1 ton. - The next loop iterates through possible maximum values
maxValuefrom 1 tom. - The innermost loop iterates over the complexity (or number of comparisons)
complexityfrom 1 tok.
- The outermost loop iterates over each position
Inside these loops, calculate ways to build arrays considering both constraints (
idxandk) by using previously computed values frompreviousandprevSum.Update values in
currentandcurrentSumarrays based on these calculations, applying modular arithmetic to ensure values do not exceed the limits of regular integer types.After each
idxiteration, copy the values fromcurrentandcurrentSumarrays intopreviousandprevSumarrays respectively to use them in the next iteration overidx.Finally, the function returns the value in
currentSum[m][k], which represents the total ways to construct the array according to the given conditions.
Ensure you understand the use of both dynamic array states (current/previous) to avoid modifications influencing current iteration results and the importance of modular arithmetic in managing large outputs.
class Calculator {
public int countSolutions(int length, int maxVal, int complexity) {
long[][] dynamicTable = new long[maxVal + 1][complexity + 1];
long[][] sumTable = new long[maxVal + 1][complexity + 1];
long[][] oldDynamic = new long[maxVal + 1][complexity + 1];
long[][] oldSum = new long[maxVal + 1][complexity + 1];
int MODULO = (int) 1e9 + 7;
for (int value = 1; value <= maxVal; value++) {
dynamicTable[value][1] = 1;
}
for (int idx = 1; idx <= length; idx++) {
if (idx > 1) {
dynamicTable = new long[maxVal + 1][complexity + 1];
}
sumTable = new long[maxVal + 1][complexity + 1];
for (int maximum = 1; maximum <= maxVal; maximum++) {
for (int cost = 1; cost <= complexity; cost++) {
long result = (maximum * oldDynamic[maximum][cost]) % MODULO;
result = (result + oldSum[maximum - 1][cost - 1]) % MODULO;
dynamicTable[maximum][cost] += result;
dynamicTable[maximum][cost] %= MODULO;
sumTable[maximum][cost] = (sumTable[maximum - 1][cost] + dynamicTable[maximum][cost]);
sumTable[maximum][cost] %= MODULO;
}
}
oldDynamic = dynamicTable;
oldSum = sumTable;
}
return (int) sumTable[maxVal][complexity];
}
}
This Java solution tackles the problem of building an array where you can find the maximum value exactly k comparisons by using dynamic programming to keep track of count distributions.
- The function
countSolutionsis defined, taking three parameters:length,maxVal, andcomplexity. These correspond to the length of the target array, the maximum value each element in the array can take, and the desired number of maximum comparisons, respectively. - The solution utilizes four 2D arrays:
dynamicTable,sumTable,oldDynamic, andoldSumto preserve states and transitional sums across different iterations. - The
MODULOconstant ensures that all numerical operations adhere to modulo (10^9 + 7) to avoid integer overflow. - Initialization begins by setting every value in
dynamicTable[value][1]to 1, assuming that each value is reachable with exactly 1 comparison for the starting position. - Iteration over the
lengthof the array follows. At each step, new tables fordynamicTableandsumTableare initialized to guarantee freshness of data. - The nested loops over
maximumandcostupdate thedynamicTableusing the formula that combines the current element's contribution and accumulative results from smaller elements and lower costs realized inoldSum. - Each result is computed modulo
MODULOto maintain manageable numbers. - After processing, the utility switches the current tables (
dynamicTableandsumTable) to old ones (oldDynamicandoldSum) for use as reference in the next iteration. - Finally, the number at
sumTable[maxVal][complexity]is returned, representing the total number of arrays of lengthlengthwhere the maximum value occurs withcomplexitycomparisons.
This approach is time-efficient and allows reuse of results due to its dynamic programming nature, partitioning complex problems into simpler, overlapping subproblems managed through tabulation.
class ArrayBuilder:
def countConfigurations(self, length: int, max_val: int, cost: int) -> int:
dp_table = [[0] * (cost + 1) for _ in range(max_val + 1)]
prefix_sum = [[0] * (cost + 1) for _ in range(max_val + 1)]
previous_dp = [[0] * (cost + 1) for _ in range(max_val + 1)]
previous_prefix = [[0] * (cost + 1) for _ in range(max_val + 1)]
MOD_CONST = 10 ** 9 + 7
for value in range(1, max_val + 1):
dp_table[value][1] = 1
for iteration in range(1, length + 1):
if iteration > 1:
dp_table = [[0] * (cost + 1) for _ in range(max_val + 1)]
prefix_sum = [[0] * (cost + 1) for _ in range(max_val + 1)]
for highest_value in range(1, max_val + 1):
for curr_cost in range(1, cost + 1):
computation = (highest_value * previous_dp[highest_value][curr_cost]) % MOD_CONST
computation = (computation + previous_prefix[highest_value - 1][curr_cost - 1]) % MOD_CONST
dp_table[highest_value][curr_cost] += computation
dp_table[highest_value][curr_cost] %= MOD_CONST
prefix_sum[highest_value][curr_cost] = (prefix_sum[highest_value - 1][curr_cost] + dp_table[highest_value][curr_cost]) % MOD_CONST
previous_dp = dp_table
previous_prefix = prefix_sum
return prefix_sum[max_val][cost]
This Python solution outlines how to find the number of configurations to build an array where the maximum value achieves a specified number of comparisons exactly k times. The solution uses dynamic programming with a complexity optimized using a prefix sum technique. Below is a detailed breakdown of the implementation steps and logic.
- Define the
countConfigurationsmethod with parameters:length,max_val, andcost, representing the length of the array, the range's maximum value, andkcomparisons, respectively. - Initialize the dynamic programming table
dp_table, another tableprefix_sumto store cumulative values, and two temporary storage listsprevious_dpandprevious_prefix. All these tables are initialized to zero and have the dimensions based onmax_valandcost. - Set up a modulus constant,
MOD_CONST, to handle large number calculations within a manageable integer range. - The base case initialization: Set all configurations of length 1 to have exactly one way to achieve any count up to the
costwith each possible maximum value. - Loop through possible array lengths. Within each iteration, reset the
dp_tableandprefix_sumfor the new values being computed. - Use nested loops for each potential highest value in the array and each potential cost. Calculate
computationby considering the previous results:- Multiplying the count of configurations ending in
highest_valuewith exactlycurr_costcomparisons byhighest_value. - Adding configurations possible with ending values less than
highest_valueand one less comparison count.
- Multiplying the count of configurations ending in
- Update the current
dp_tableand keep the cumulative sums updated inprefix_sum. - After all iterations, the value of
prefix_sum[max_val][cost]gives the total configurations for the specified conditions.
This model handles various scenarios effectively using the principles of dynamic programming and prefix sum arrays, considering the constraints given by the modulus operation for computational efficiency in a problem that has potential to operate on large numbers. The approach ensures that time complexity is manageable by careful recalculations only when necessary, made efficient by leveraging computed data from the previous iterations.