
Problem Statement
Given an array of integers nums
and an integer k
, both supplied as input, the array nums
has size n
where n
is a multiple of 3. The task is to partition this array into subarrays of size 3, ensuring a specific condition holds: the difference between any two elements within each subarray should be less than or equal to k
.
Your goal is to return a 2D array which includes these subarrays. Taking note that, if the condition cannot be met for partitioning, an empty array should be returned. In the scenario that multiple valid partitions could solve this issue, any valid partition can be an acceptable return.
This task emphasizes understanding the array division based on value proximity constraints specified by k
.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
nums = [1,3,4,8,7,9,3,5,1], k = 2
Output:
[[1,1,3],[3,4,5],[7,8,9]]
Explanation:
The difference between any two elements in each array is less than or equal to 2.
Example 2
Input:
nums = [2,4,2,2,5,2], k = 2
Output:
[]
Explanation:
Different ways to divide `nums` into 2 arrays of size 3 are: * [[2,2,2],[2,4,5]] (and its permutations) * [[2,2,4],[2,2,5]] (and its permutations) Because there are four 2s there will be an array with the elements 2 and 5 no matter how we divide it. since `5 - 2 = 3 > k`, the condition is not satisfied and so there is no valid division.
Example 3
Input:
nums = [4,2,9,8,2,12,7,12,10,5,8,5,5,7,9,2,5,11], k = 14
Output:
[[2,2,12],[4,8,5],[5,9,7],[7,8,5],[5,9,10],[11,12,2]]
Explanation:
The difference between any two elements in each array is less than or equal to 14.
Constraints
n == nums.length
1 <= n <= 105
n
is a multiple of 31 <= nums[i] <= 105
1 <= k <= 105
Approach and Intuition
The task begins with understanding how to structure the subsets and what constitutes a violation of the given constraints. Let’s explore this through the steps highlighted:
Sorting the Array:
- Sorting
nums
helps in easily partitioning the array into chunks of three. When elements are sorted, the smallest and the largest in each 3-tuple will naturally be the two endpoints when sliced continuously.
- Sorting
Iterative Check:
- After sorting, we can iterate over the array in steps of three. For each chunk, check if the maximum difference between elements exceeds the allowed maximum
k
. This effectively only requires checking the first and last element of each three-item chunk (since it is sorted).
- After sorting, we can iterate over the array in steps of three. For each chunk, check if the maximum difference between elements exceeds the allowed maximum
Return Based on Checks:
- If any chunk fails the difference check, immediately return an empty array indicating that it's impossible to divide the array under the given constraints.
- If all chunks pass, return the list of these chunks.
The provided examples illustrate varied scenarios where:
- In the first example, a properly sorted array allows easy chunking into groups of three without exceeding the difference constraint set by
k
. - The second example shows a situation where it's impossible to divide the array into groups of three without exceeding
k
due to the distribution of values. - The third example, despite a larger array and a more generous
k
, still necessitates careful sorting and checking but does uniformly allow for passing the conditions.
Understanding the implicit requirement to sort and checking localized conditions within small, contiguous subarrays is paramount in solving this problem efficiently.
Solutions
- C++
- Java
- JavaScript
- Python
class Solution {
public:
vector<vector<int>> groupNumbers(vector<int>& arr, int threshold) {
sort(arr.begin(), arr.end());
vector<vector<int>> result;
for (int i = 0; i < arr.size(); i += 3) {
if (arr[i + 2] - arr[i] > threshold) {
return {};
}
result.push_back({arr[i], arr[i + 1], arr[i + 2]});
}
return result;
}
};
The solution involves creating groups of consecutive numbers from a sorted array such that the difference between the maximum and minimum values in each group does not exceed a specified threshold. The following steps outline how to achieve this using C++:
Sort the input array. This ensures that the difference between consecutive elements is minimized, which is crucial for forming valid groups.
Initialize an empty 2D vector to store the result. This vector will hold the groups that meet the threshold condition.
Iterate through the array in steps of three. The step size of three indicates that each group will contain exactly three numbers. This is a fixed group size as seen in the implementation.
Check if the difference between the first and the last number in the current group exceeds the threshold. If it does, immediately return an empty vector since it's impossible to form a valid group with the current threshold.
If the difference is within the threshold, add the group to the result vector.
Continue this process until all elements have been grouped or the function exits early due to an invalid group.
Return the result vector containing all valid groups.
This approach ensures efficient grouping by leveraging sorting, which is O(n log n), followed by a linear scan to form groups, ensuring overall efficient execution. Note that the function assumes the input array’s size is divisible by three, as it does not handle cases where the last few elements might not form a complete group of three.
class Solution {
public int[][] partitionArray(int[] arr, int diffLimit) {
Arrays.sort(arr);
int[][] result = new int[arr.length / 3][3];
for (int j = 0; j < arr.length; j += 3) {
if (arr[j + 2] - arr[j] > diffLimit) {
return new int[0][0];
}
result[j / 3] = new int[]{arr[j], arr[j + 1], arr[j + 2]};
}
return result;
}
}
This Java solution involves dividing a sorted array into smaller arrays, where each subarray contains exactly three elements and must conform to a specific maximum difference (diffLimit
) between the smallest and largest numbers in the subarray. The solution follows these steps:
- Sort the input array using the
Arrays.sort()
method. This sorting helps in easily finding subarrays that satisfy the difference condition. - Initialize a 2D array
result
to store the subarrays. The size of this array is determined by dividing the length of the input array by 3, as each subarray is expected to contain three elements. - Iterate through the sorted array in steps of three to form subarrays. During each iteration, check if the difference between the first and third elements in the current segment exceeds the
diffLimit
. - If the difference condition is violated, immediately return an empty 2D array, indicating the impossibility of forming the desired subarrays.
- If the condition is met, store the current segment in the
result
array. - Return the
result
array which contains all the valid subarrays.
The method is efficient and succinct, handling edge cases such as exceeding the difference limit by promptly returning an empty array. This solution ensures each group of three consecutive elements from the sorted array forms a valid subarray, strictly adhering to the specified maximum difference.
var splitArrayInTriples = function(array, threshold) {
array.sort((x, y) => x - y);
const result = [];
for (let index = 0; index < array.length; index += 3) {
if (array[index + 2] - array[index] > threshold) {
return [];
}
result.push([array[index], array[index + 1], array[index + 2]]);
}
return result;
};
This solution addresses the problem of dividing an array into groups of three elements each, such that the maximum difference within any group does not exceed a specified threshold. The following steps outline how the JavaScript function splitArrayInTriples
achieves this:
- Sort the input array to ensure elements are arranged in ascending order, which simplifies the comparison of elements for forming triples.
- Initialize an empty array named
result
to store the groups of triples that meet the condition. - Iterate through the array using a loop that increases the index by three each step, which naturally segments the array into groups of three.
- During each iteration, check if the difference between the first and third elements in the current group exceeds the given threshold.
- If the difference exceeds the threshold, the function immediately returns an empty array indicating that it is not possible to split the array under the given conditions.
- If the difference is within the threshold, add the current triple (three consecutive elements from the array) to the
result
array. - Return the
result
array after the loop completes, which contains all valid triples if the array can be successfully split as per the conditions.
This approach ensures an efficient division of the array while strictly adhering to the maximum difference constraint.
class Solution:
def partitionArray(self, array: List[int], limit: int) -> List[List[int]]:
array.sort()
result = []
for i in range(0, len(array), 3):
if array[i + 2] - array[i] > limit:
return []
result.append([array[i], array[i + 1], array[i + 2]])
return result
This solution addresses the problem of partitioning an array into smaller arrays where the maximum difference between the largest and smallest elements in each subarray does not exceed a given limit. It's written in Python and employs a basic strategy to achieve this.
Start by sorting the original array. This sorting step ensures that elements are arranged in ascending order, which facilitates checking the differences within potential subarrays.
Create an empty list named result
to store the subarrays that match the criteria.
Use a loop to process the sorted array in steps of three. Within each step, check the condition that the difference between the maximum and minimum element of the current triplet (i.e. subarray) is within the given limit. If any triplet exceeds the limit, return an empty list indicating the partitioning isn't possible under the constraint.
If a valid triplet is found, append this triplet to the result
list.
Finally, after all suitable triplets have been processed, return the result
, which contains the required subarrays.
Ensure to handle all edge cases, especially when the array length isn't a multiple of three, as the solution assumes sets of exactly three elements. Adjustments might be needed for arrays with different sizes or additional validations for cases not divisible by three.
No comments yet.