Minimum Difficulty of a Job Schedule

Updated on 09 June, 2025
Minimum Difficulty of a Job Schedule header image

Problem Statement

In this scheduling problem, you are tasked to distribute a sequence of jobs over a given number of d days, while adhering to specific job dependency rules. Each job has an associated difficulty, represented in the sequence jobDifficulty, where jobDifficulty[i] corresponds to the difficulty of the i-th job. A job's placement in this sequence symbolizes its dependency, meaning the i-th job can only be executed if all preceding jobs have been completed.

The scheduling constraint requires that at least one job must be completed each day. The challenge lies in how the schedule's difficulty is calculated: the difficulty for each day is equivalent to the difficulty of the hardest job completed that day, and the total schedule difficulty is the sum of difficulties across all d days.

The task is to determine the minimum possible difficulty for completing all jobs within d days. However, if allocating all jobs within the required d days proves infeasible, the function should return -1. This necessitates strategic job grouping across days to minimize peak daily job difficulties while ensuring the sequence and dependency constraints are met.

Examples

Example 1

Input:

jobDifficulty = [6,5,4,3,2,1], d = 2

Output:

7

Explanation:

First day you can finish the first 5 jobs, total difficulty = 6.
Second day you can finish the last job, total difficulty = 1.
The difficulty of the schedule = 6 + 1 = 7

Example 2

Input:

jobDifficulty = [9,9,9], d = 4

Output:

-1

Explanation:

If you finish a job per day you will still have a free day. you cannot find a schedule for the given jobs.

Example 3

Input:

jobDifficulty = [1,1,1], d = 3

Output:

3

Explanation:

The schedule is one job per day. total difficulty will be 3.

Constraints

  • 1 <= jobDifficulty.length <= 300
  • 0 <= jobDifficulty[i] <= 1000
  • 1 <= d <= 10

Approach and Intuition

The problem essentially boils down to partitioning the job difficulties into d subarrays (one for each day), with each partition's difficulty determined by its maximum element. This is a complex combinatorial optimization problem that resembles the "k-partition problem", typically solved using dynamic programming for efficiency given the constraints.

  1. Initial Checks:

    • If the number of days d is greater than the number of jobs, direct output -1 since we can't allocate more days than jobs while ensuring at least one job per day.
  2. Dynamic Programming Setup:

    • We maintain a DP table where dp[i][j] represents the minimum difficulty of scheduling the first i jobs in j days.
    • Initialize the table with high values since we seek to minimize.
  3. Filling the DP Table:

    • For each day j from 1 to d:
      • For each job i from 1 to the length of jobDifficulty:
        • Calculate the minimum possible difficulty of scheduling the first i jobs in j days by trying every possible partition point k.
        • The difficulty of scheduling jobs from k+1 to i on the j-th day is the maximum job difficulty among these jobs.
  4. Extracting the Final Answer:

    • The value at dp[n][d] (where n is the total number of jobs) will be our answer, representing the minimum difficulty of scheduling all jobs over d days. If this value remains unchanged from initialization, return -1.

Several edge cases and optimizations must be considered in the implementation, such as efficiently finding the maximum in a sliding window for successive partitions. This problem touches on concepts like job partitioning, maximizing and minimizing nested structures, and dynamic state management, all intertwined within a well-structured dynamic programming approach.

Solutions

  • Java
  • Python
java
class Solution {
    public int findMinDifficulty(int[] jobs, int days) {
        int jobCount = jobs.length;
        if (jobCount < days) {
            return -1;
        }

        int[] prevMinDiff = new int[jobCount];
        int[] currMinDiff = new int[jobCount];
        int[] swap;
        
        Arrays.fill(prevMinDiff, 1000);
        Deque<Integer> indices = new ArrayDeque<>();

        for (int dayCounter = 0; dayCounter < days; ++dayCounter) {
            indices.clear();
            for (int j = dayCounter; j < jobCount; j++) {
                currMinDiff[j] = j > 0 ? prevMinDiff[j - 1] + jobs[j] : jobs[j];
                while (!indices.isEmpty() && jobs[indices.peek()] <= jobs[j]) {
                    int index = indices.pop();
                    int difficultyIncrease = jobs[j] - jobs[index];
                    currMinDiff[j] = Math.min(currMinDiff[j], currMinDiff[index] + difficultyIncrease);
                }

                if (!indices.isEmpty()) {
                    currMinDiff[j] = Math.min(currMinDiff[j], currMinDiff[indices.peek()]);
                }

                indices.push(j);
            }
            swap = prevMinDiff;
            prevMinDiff = currMinDiff;
            currMinDiff = swap;
        }

        return prevMinDiff[jobCount - 1];
    }
}

The Java code provided addresses the problem of finding the minimum difficulty of a job schedule for a given number of days. The solution involves dynamic programming to efficiently manage and compute the minimum possible difficulty over specified days.

The key strategy in the code is as follows:

  • First, a check ensures there are enough jobs to fill each day; if not, the function returns -1.
  • Two arrays, prevMinDiff and currMinDiff, are introduced to hold temporal results for the minimum difficulty computations.
  • The function uses a sliding window approach, maintained by a deque (indices), to keep track of indices in the job list that offer the least increase in difficulty if selected for the current day's end.
  • For each day in the job scheduling (outer loop over days), the code adjusts the deque and updates the challenges in the currMinDiff array based on the minimum difficulty encountered using previously computed results from prevMinDiff.
  • After completing the inner loop over job indices, prevMinDiff and currMinDiff arrays are swapped, storing the current day's results to be used as "previous" for the next day calculation.

By the end of the designated number of days, the element prevMinDiff[jobCount - 1] will reveal the minimum difficulty of the entire schedule. This efficient approach ensures that each day's computation considers the best arrangement up to that point, optimizing both time and space complexity using dynamic programming techniques.

python
class Solution:
    def calculateMinDifficulty(self, jobDiff, days):
        total_jobs = len(jobDiff)
        if total_jobs < days:
            return -1

        previous_day_diff, current_day_diff = [float('inf')] * total_jobs, [float('inf')] * total_jobs

        for day_idx in range(days):
            monotonous_stack = []
            for job_idx in range(day_idx, total_jobs):

                if job_idx == 0:
                    current_day_diff[job_idx] = jobDiff[0]
                else:
                    current_day_diff[job_idx] = previous_day_diff[job_idx - 1] + jobDiff[job_idx]

                while monotonous_stack and jobDiff[monotonous_stack[-1]] <= jobDiff[job_idx]:

                    popped_idx = monotonous_stack.pop()
                    difficulty_increase = jobDiff[job_idx] - jobDiff[popped_idx]
                    current_day_diff[job_idx] = min(current_day_diff[job_idx], current_day_diff[popped_idx] + difficulty_increase)

                if monotonous_stack:
                    current_day_diff[job_idx] = min(current_day_diff[job_idx], current_day_diff[monotonous_stack[-1]])

                monotonous_stack.append(job_idx)

            previous_day_diff, current_day_diff = current_day_diff, previous_day_diff

        return previous_day_diff[-1]

The given Python solution strategically determines the minimum difficulty of scheduling job tasks over a specified number of days. The function calculateMinDifficulty takes two parameters: jobDiff, an array where each element represents the difficulty of a job, and days, the number of days to schedule these jobs.

  • Initialize the length of jobDiff to total_jobs.
  • If the number of jobs is less than the required days, return -1 since it's not possible to schedule them.
  • Use dynamic programming with two lists, previous_day_diff and current_day_diff, initialized with float('inf'), to keep track of the minimum difficulty at each step.
  • Loop through each day using day_idx and through each job using job_idx from day_idx to total_jobs.
  • Use a monotonous stack to efficiently calculate the minimum difficulty:
    • For the start of a segment, set the difficulty directly from jobDiff.
    • For other jobs, compute the minimum difficulty by comparing current difficulty with the potential difficulty if this job was included in the current day’s task.
    • While jobs in the stack have difficulty less than the current job, update the current day's difficulty considering the increased difficulty due to the harder current job.
    • The stack helps in maintaining jobs in descending order of their difficulty, ensuring that every job is only computed with the more difficult ones preceding it.
  • After scanning through all jobs for the day, swap previous_day_diff and current_day_diff to proceed to the next day.
  • After processing all days, the last element in previous_day_diff gives the minimum difficulty for scheduling all jobs within the specified days.

Comments

No comments yet.