
Problem Statement
The goal is to generate a string s
of length a + b
, where a
represents the exact number of 'a' characters and b
the exact number of 'b' characters in the string. The string must be formatted such that it does not contain the substring 'aaa' or 'bbb', ensuring that no three consecutive identical characters are present. The challenge lies in structuring the string to meet these criteria while utilizing all given 'a's and 'b's.
Examples
Example 1
Input:
a = 1, b = 2
Output:
"abb"
Explanation:
"abb", "bab" and "bba" are all correct answers.
Example 2
Input:
a = 4, b = 1
Output:
"aabaa"
Constraints
0 <= a, b <= 100
- It is guaranteed such an
s
exists for the givena
andb
.
Approach and Intuition
When designing a string s
that includes a specific number of 'a' and 'b' characters without forming the substrings 'aaa' or 'bbb', here's a logical strategy:
Initialization: Start by identifying which character is in the majority (
a
orb
). This will help in deciding the primary looping character.Greedy Construction: Use a greedy approach where you alternately place characters, but avoid placing more than two of the same character consecutively:
If
a > b
, start with 'a'. For every 'a' added, if possible add a 'b' to break a potential sequence of three 'a' characters.If
b > a
, start with 'b'. Similarly, add 'a' after every two 'b's to prevent the formation of 'bbb'.
Balance Characters: Make sure that after inserting two same characters, insert the opposite character if there are remaining counts of the opposite character. This helps in balancing out the counts and maintaining the required format.
Edge Cases:
- If
a
orb
equals zero, the resultant string will simply be the repeated character of the non-zero count but constrained to groups of at most two (e.g., "aa" or "bb").
- If
Handling Equal Numbers: If
a
is equal tob
, alternate them, like "ababab...". This automatically avoids the appearance of three consecutive same characters.
Examples are instrumental in understanding and verifying this approach:
For
a = 1, b = 2
: Starting with the majority, the string could be "bba", "bab" or "abb".For
a = 4, b = 1
: The approach would suggest starting with 'a', then inserting a 'b' to prevent three 'a's in a row, resulting in "aabaa".
This methodology provides a structured way to construct the string while adhering to the constraints on consecutive characters.
Solutions
- Java
class Solution {
public String buildString(int countA, int countB) {
StringBuilder result = new StringBuilder();
while (countA > 0 || countB > 0) {
boolean appendA = false;
int length = result.length();
if (length >= 2 && result.charAt(length-1) == result.charAt(length-2)) {
if (result.charAt(length-1) == 'b')
appendA = true;
} else {
if (countA >= countB)
appendA = true;
}
if (appendA) {
countA--;
result.append('a');
} else {
countB--;
result.append('b');
}
}
return result.toString();
}
}
This solution involves constructing a string in Java without having the substrings "AAA" or "BBB" using a specific count of 'A' and 'B' characters. The buildString
method in the Solution
class achieves this by utilizing a StringBuilder
object to dynamically construct the desired string based on the counts of 'A's (countA
) and 'B's (countB
).
- Initialize a
StringBuilder
to store the resulting string. - Use a
while
loop to continue adding characters until bothcountA
andcountB
are zero. - Determine whether to append 'A' or 'B' based on the current sequence:
- Check the last two characters of the StringBuilder; if they are the same, append the opposite character to avoid creating a substring of "AAA" or "BBB".
- If the sequence does not risk creating such substrings, append the character that occurs more frequently (
countA
versuscountB
) to maintain as even a distribution as possible. - Decrement the count (either
countA
orcountB
) accordingly after appending a character.
- Return the resulting string once the loop terminates.
This approach ensures proper handling of character distribution, maintaining the condition of not having three consecutive same letters and keeps the code efficient and straightforward.
No comments yet.